2011
DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwr005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E pluribus unum? A critical survey of job quality indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
146
0
16

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
146
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, they opt to interpret working conditions using sets of related indicators and analyse them in terms of multiple aspects. The work of Muñoz de Bustillo, Fernández-Marcías, Esteve and Antón [50] is particularly helpful in understanding the multidimensional nature that an analysis of job quality might assume. In the paper cited, they provide an overview of a series of different analyses, reflecting on the advantages and drawbacks of each, and comparing their conceptual characteristics and the methodological choices involved ("several important methodological dilemmas").…”
Section: Sustainability and Quality Of Working Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, they opt to interpret working conditions using sets of related indicators and analyse them in terms of multiple aspects. The work of Muñoz de Bustillo, Fernández-Marcías, Esteve and Antón [50] is particularly helpful in understanding the multidimensional nature that an analysis of job quality might assume. In the paper cited, they provide an overview of a series of different analyses, reflecting on the advantages and drawbacks of each, and comparing their conceptual characteristics and the methodological choices involved ("several important methodological dilemmas").…”
Section: Sustainability and Quality Of Working Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green 2006;Grimshaw et al 2008;Kalleberg 2011;Osterman and Shulman 2011;Findlay et al 2013). This investigation of employment polarization initially exposed a "conceptualization deficit" (Findlay et al 2013, p 442) that signaled the need for more elaborate typologies of good and bad jobs (see Muñoz de Bustillo et al 2009). Researchers 6 have since elaborated characteristics of good and bad jobs, in the process generating sophisticated typologies of each that are a crucial contribution towards conceptualizing UFW.…”
Section: Good Jobsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green 2006Green , 2008Gallie et al 2004;Holman 2013). The recent literature also increasingly captures subjective components of jobs through its attentiveness to workers' choices, values, and constraints (see Cooke et al 2013), in particular job satisfaction, employee work preferences and perceived fulfillment (Clark 2005;Tsitsianis and Green 2006;Brown et al 2007;Bustillo et al 2009). The broadest typologies therefore capture job quality in relation to individuals' life stages, values, and opportunities.…”
Section: Multi-dimensional Models Of Good Jobsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, the job features which are highly regarded in one country may be considered much less valuable in others -for example, for Japanese employees usefulness to society is the most important feature of a good job; whilst within America and Europe, job security and interesting work are the most critical (Muñoz de Bustillo Llorente et al, 2009). A key difficulty when measuring job quality then, is that there is 'no international agreement as to what job quality is and how it might be measured' (Muñoz de Bustillo et al, 2011). In addition to international and cultural differences in perceptions of what contributes to good quality work (Wallace et al, 2007), there are also differences between individuals, influenced by factors such as age, gender and various personality attributes (see Warr (2007) for a review), as well as personal and socioeconomic circumstances (Cooke et al, 2013;Loughlin and Murray, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%