2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ieom.2015.7093747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-waste reverse logistic optimization in Egypt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And last, in addition to the above research on e-waste, there are many studies that mainly proposed models to optimize the collection, recycling and disposal of e-waste, or proposed a reverse logistics network model for e-waste and solved it using some methods and technique. Some scholars also analysed the factors affecting the reverse logistics activities of e-waste and the current challenges, and made recommendations (Shrivastava et al, 2005;Mou et al, 2006;Lehtinen & Poikela, 2006;Yin, 2008;Wei & Zhang, 2008;Gamberini et al, 2009;Efendigil et al, 2012;Phuc et al, 2013;Yeh & Xu, 2013;Shokohyar & Mansour, 2013;Zeng et al, 2015;Elbadrawy et al, 2015;Capraz et al, 2015;Xia et al, 2016;Tesfaye et al, 2017;John et al, 2018).…”
Section: Optimization Of the Reverse Logistics Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And last, in addition to the above research on e-waste, there are many studies that mainly proposed models to optimize the collection, recycling and disposal of e-waste, or proposed a reverse logistics network model for e-waste and solved it using some methods and technique. Some scholars also analysed the factors affecting the reverse logistics activities of e-waste and the current challenges, and made recommendations (Shrivastava et al, 2005;Mou et al, 2006;Lehtinen & Poikela, 2006;Yin, 2008;Wei & Zhang, 2008;Gamberini et al, 2009;Efendigil et al, 2012;Phuc et al, 2013;Yeh & Xu, 2013;Shokohyar & Mansour, 2013;Zeng et al, 2015;Elbadrawy et al, 2015;Capraz et al, 2015;Xia et al, 2016;Tesfaye et al, 2017;John et al, 2018).…”
Section: Optimization Of the Reverse Logistics Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good decision making is based on experience, testing and error or a comparison of various waste management integrated options [17]. While the optimal decision-making method allows you to choose nearly the optimal state, these methods are currently not applicable due to the increasing number of different combinations in the decision-making process, because decisions are taken without a scientific basis, where the results are not acceptable [18][19][20]. Based on the discussion, the contribution of the paper is described as follows:…”
Section: Basic Information About E-wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good decision making is based on experience, testing and error or a comparison of various waste management integrated options [17]. While the optimal decision‐making method allows you to choose nearly the optimal state, these methods are currently not applicable due to the increasing number of different combinations in the decision‐making process, because decisions are taken without a scientific basis, where the results are not acceptable [18–20]. Based on the discussion, the contribution of the paper is described as follows: To emphasise the need to assess the impact on economic environmental and social sustainability quality of reconfigurations by e‐waste treatment facilities. The mathematical model of the proposed decision‐making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method has been demonstrated for the decision making, estimation of transportation cost and reusability. To provide decision support methods for companies working on e‐waste management for the evaluation of reconfiguring E‐waste management systems (EMS) against sustainability criteria, particularly concerning the sorting of e‐waste. The remainder of the paper decorated as follows.…”
Section: Basic Information About E‐wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the existence of qualitative and quantitative variables that demand attention in the decision process, the SST choice can be seen as a complex MDCM process. To assess the SST selection process, diverse MCDM techniques have been widely used in the previous literature: AHP was used [37] to ranked five electronic banking techniques encompassing ATM Banking, Phone Banking, Internet Banking, Mobile banking and SMS banking; Thamaraiselvan [32] applied AHP to prioritize ATM, Internet Banking, Mobile Banking; AHP and PROMETHEE [38] was combined to evaluate the performance of three electronics banking service ATMs, Telephone Banking, and Internet Banking; Amiri [39] investigated and explained effective factors for improving e-banking by using Fuzzy TOPSIS in Persian bank. The recent applications of Hybrid-MCDM or MCDM approach for various problems and issues considered are presented in brief and listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%