2012
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.294975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E1-E2 Interactions in Ubiquitin and Nedd8 Ligation Pathways

Abstract: Background: Ubiquitin carrier protein (E2) recognition by ubiquitin activating enzyme (E1) defines fidelity in subsequent conjugation reactions. Results: E2 transthiolation kinetics identify structural features defining the specificity of E1-E2 binding. Conclusion: E2 paralogs contain a conserved E1 binding motif, and the E1 ␤-grasp domain is a specificity filter for E2 binding. Significance: This defines structural features determining ubiquitin conjugation fidelity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
73
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Active Uba1 was quantitated by the stoichiometric formation of 125 I-ubiquitin thioester (27,28). Recombinant human E2 proteins were those used previously (29), the activities of which were quantitated by the stoichiometric formation of E2-125 I-ubiquitin thioester and compared with the expected activities based on protein content determined by their calculated 280 nm extinction coefficients (10,28). Point mutants of Ubc5A were created using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene) (29,30).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Active Uba1 was quantitated by the stoichiometric formation of 125 I-ubiquitin thioester (27,28). Recombinant human E2 proteins were those used previously (29), the activities of which were quantitated by the stoichiometric formation of E2-125 I-ubiquitin thioester and compared with the expected activities based on protein content determined by their calculated 280 nm extinction coefficients (10,28). Point mutants of Ubc5A were created using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene) (29,30).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recombinant human E2 proteins were those used previously (29), the activities of which were quantitated by the stoichiometric formation of E2-125 I-ubiquitin thioester and compared with the expected activities based on protein content determined by their calculated 280 nm extinction coefficients (10,28). Point mutants of Ubc5A were created using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene) (29,30). Recombinant human IsoT (USP5) was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cultures harboring pRSIsoT (generous gift of Dr. Keith Wilkinson, Emory University School of Medicine) and purified to apparent homogeneity as described previously (31).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After 15 h, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6,000 ϫ g for 15 min; resuspended in ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT; and lysed by Emulsiflex (Avestin). The resulting lysate was centrifuged at 100,000 ϫ g for 45 min, and GST-Ubc5 protein was purified from the 100,000 ϫ g supernatant by glutathione-Sepharose (GE Life Sciences) affinity chromatography using a 10-ml bed volume gravity flow column (40). The GST-E2 fusion proteins were processed with 50 units/ml thrombin (GE Life Sciences) to cleave the GST tag, and the resulting Ubc5 polypeptide was collected in the unadsorbed fraction of a subsequent glutathione-Sepharose affinity purification step designed to remove free GST.…”
Section: Generation and Purification Of Recombinant E2 Paralogs-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in experiments in which UAE was charged with NEDD8, a UBL that shares ϳ60% sequence homology with ubiquitin, it was shown that NEDD8 was efficiently transferred to UAE-ubiquitin pathway specific E2s (10,11). Furthermore, it was also found that E1 enzymes specifically bind their cognate E2 through specific interactions in their ␤-grasp domains irrespective of the UBL (12). This suggests that the UBL pathway specificity is determined by cognate recognition of UBL and E2 by the E1 and that there is no intrinsic discrimination against noncognate UBLs in E1-E2 transfer or subsequent steps (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%