In the present study, we performed a detailed kinetic analysis of the enzymes TEM-149, TEM-149 H240 , and TEM-149
H164-H240versus a large panel of inhibitors/inactivators, including penicillins, penems, carbapenems, monobactams, cephamycin, and carbacephem. These compounds behaved as poor substrates versus TEM-149, TEM-149 H240 , and TEM-149 H164-H240 -lactamases, and the K i (inhibition constant), K (dissociation constant of the Henri-Michaelis complex), k ؉2 and k ؉3 (first-order acylation and deacylation constants, respectively), and k ؉2 /K values were calculated.T EM-1 is the prototype of the TEM family of enzymes, which can hydrolyze penicillins and cephalosporins. During the last 20 years, TEM-1 underwent a natural evolution because of the selective pressure of -lactams (1). Several TEM variants, including extended-spectrum -lactamases (ESBLs) and inhibitor-resistant TEMs (IRTs), have been generated (217 TEM enzymes by K. Bush and G. A. Jacoby [www.lahey.org/Studies/]). Such high numbers of variants are the consequence of the ability of the TEM -lactamases to tolerate amino acid substitutions. The plasticity of these enzymes is increased by their ability to acquire compensatory mutations. Nevertheless, only a few mutations are directly involved in enzymatic catalysis. Some of these mutations expand the ESBL phenotype, while others are involved in enzyme stability as M182T and L201P substitutions (2).TEM-149, an extended-spectrum -lactamase isolated in Italy in 2003 from Enterobacter aerogenes and Serratia marcescens, shows an array of amino acid changes, including E104K, R164S, M182T, and E240V (3). The novelty of this enzyme is the unexpected presence of valine at position 240 in place of the common glutamic acid or lysine. As previously described, the combination of mutations found in TEM-149 enhances catalytic efficiency versus that from ceftazidime and aztreonam. This behavior is most probably due to a better accommodation of these substrates in the catalytic site of the enzyme (3).The production and purification of the TEM-149, TEM-149 H240 , and TEM-149 H164-H240 enzymes were performed as described elsewhere (3, 4).Nitrocefin was kindly provided by Shariar Mobashery (Notre Dame University, South Bend, IN, USA). Meropenem was from AstraZeneca (Milan, Italy). Imipenem, ertapenem, and cefoxitin were from Merck Sharp & Dohme (Rome, Italy). Temocillin, ticarcillin, and BRL42715b were from SmithKline Beecham (Brentford, United Kingdom). Tigemonam was from Bristol-Myers Squibb (New York, NY, USA). Carumonam was from Roche (Milan, Italy). The penem CP65207 was from Pfizer (New York, NY, USA). The penem HR664 was from Hoechst Italia (Milan, Italy). Biapenem was from Cyanamid (Catania, Italy). Loracarbef (carbacephem) was from Eli Lilly and Co. (Indianapolis, IN, USA). Most of these compounds, such as BRL42715b, CP65207, and HR664, were conserved in our laboratory for long periods of time under appropriate conditions, and their stabilities and concentrations were verified by spectrophotometric analysis....