2004
DOI: 10.1101/gr.3152604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EAnnot: A genome annotation tool using experimental evidence

Abstract: The sequence of any genome becomes most useful for biological experimentation when a complete and accurate gene set is available. Gene prediction programs offer an efficient way to generate an automated gene set. Manual annotation, when performed by experienced annotators, is more accurate and complete than automated annotation. However, it is a laborious and expensive process, and by its nature, introduces a degree of variability not found with automated annotation. EAnnot (Electronic Annotation) is a program… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The masked assembly was used to call genes. In total, 38,768 protein coding sequences were predicted using the assembly contigs through a 6-tier gene-calling pipeline(Ding et al 2004). ..…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The masked assembly was used to call genes. In total, 38,768 protein coding sequences were predicted using the assembly contigs through a 6-tier gene-calling pipeline(Ding et al 2004). ..…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes can be predicted using several evidence-based prediction programs, such as Genewise (Birney et al . 2004), FGENESH_PLUS (Salamov and Solovyev, 2000), Eannot (Ding et al . 2004), and ab initio predictions, such as Fgenesh (Salamov and Solovyev, 2000), GeneMark (Besemer and Borodovsky, 2005) and Snap (Korf, 2004) and the Ensembl annotation pipeline (Clamp et al .…”
Section: The Genome Sequencing Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, a combined approach is used to minimize the number of occasions on which different gene prediction algorithms give different results for the same region of the genome. Genes can be predicted using several evidence-based prediction programs, such as Genewise (Birney et al 2004), FGENESH_PLUS (Salamov and Solovyev, 2000), Eannot (Ding et al 2004), and ab initio predictions, such as Fgenesh (Salamov and Solovyev, 2000), GeneMark (Besemer and Borodovsky, 2005) and Snap (Korf, 2004) and the Ensembl annotation pipeline (Clamp et al 2003). The available ESTs from T. spiralis (Mitreva et al 2004) will provide valuable information when used via the evidence-based gene prediction algorithms to determine exon/intron and gene boundaries as well as splice-isoforms.…”
Section: The Genome Sequencing Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The masked assembly was used to call genes. In total, 5,538 genes were identified through a 6-tier gene-calling pipeline [19]. In addition, of the 3,840 genes that were identified by our previous A. caninum EST approach [8] 3,589 (represented by 4,816 contig consensus sequences) were not incorporated in calling genes, and therefore added to the list of identified unique genes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%