2009 Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iih-msp.2009.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ear Detection Based on Arc-Masking Extraction and AdaBoost Polling Verification

Abstract: This paper proposes a simple but practical 2D ear detection algorithm based on arc-masking candidate extraction and AdaBoost polling verification. In the first half phase of the proposed ear detection algorithm, a few ear candidates are extracted by arc-masking edge search followed by multilayer mosaic and orthogonal projection histogram. Then, in the second half phase, the most likely ear candidate is picked out by rough AdaBoost polling verification. Experimental results show that the proposed ear detection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Learning-based detection methods have been proposed owing to their accuracy and robustness advantages for ear detection, e.g., the AdaBoost algorithm and its modified version [24,25] and ear detection involving faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN) frameworks [26], a modified multiple scale faster region-based convolutional neural network [14], geometrics morphometrics and deep learning [27] and convolutional encoder-decoder networks for ear detection [28]. Automatic ear detection methods have achieved good performance under no occlusion or noise conditions; for example, the accuracy of the method in [12] is 93.34% for 700 images, and that in [19] is 97.57% for 267 images.…”
Section: Automatic 2d Ear Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning-based detection methods have been proposed owing to their accuracy and robustness advantages for ear detection, e.g., the AdaBoost algorithm and its modified version [24,25] and ear detection involving faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN) frameworks [26], a modified multiple scale faster region-based convolutional neural network [14], geometrics morphometrics and deep learning [27] and convolutional encoder-decoder networks for ear detection [28]. Automatic ear detection methods have achieved good performance under no occlusion or noise conditions; for example, the accuracy of the method in [12] is 93.34% for 700 images, and that in [19] is 97.57% for 267 images.…”
Section: Automatic 2d Ear Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abaza et al [31] modified the Adaboost algorithm and reduced the training time significantly. Shih et al [32] presented a two-step ear detection system, which utilized arc-masking candidate extraction and AdaBoost polling verification. Firstly, the ear candidates were extracted by an arc-masking edge search algorithm; then the ear was located by rough AdaBoost polling verification.…”
Section: Ear Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shih et.al. [5] also adopt Haar-like features and AdaBoost algorithm for their segmentation but they implemented Arc-masking edge search and multilayer mosaic to enhance the ear region.…”
Section: Ear Recognition Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shih et.al. [5] used the pixel intensities to highlight the ear region. Yuan and Mu, on the other hand, applied Active Shape Model which is based on the shape feature to extract the ear region in [6].…”
Section: Ear Recognition Processmentioning
confidence: 99%