Ear Reconstruction: Empirical Data of 406 Cases of Carving the Convex Structures of the Framework

Abstract

Objective In auricular reconstruction, the convex structures of the framework determine the esthetics, and young doctors often need sufficient training to determine the best carving techniques. This study aimed to recommend optimal carving methods and provide measured data of convex structures of the carved costal cartilage framework to prevent complications, improve esthetics, and reduce the learning curve. Methods From 2018 to 2021, 406 patients with microtia who underwent costal cartilage carving were enrolled. The helix is formed by the eighth costal cartilage. The complex of the antihelix was fabricated from part of the eighth costal cartilage or the ninth costal cartilage. The tragus was constructed using residual cartilage pieces from the base frame. These components were measured, and those from the new ear graded “excellent” were used for data analysis. The statistical analysis was principally processed using Excel software. Results A total of 112 ears were graded “excellent”. The following are the mean and standard deviation of each group of data: antihelix thickness, 0.31 ± 0.06 cm; antihelix width, 0.40 ± 0.06 cm; superior crus thickness, 0.18 ± 0.04 cm; superior crus width, 0.38 ± 0.09 cm; inferior crus width, 0.22 ± 0.04 cm; inferior crus thickness, 0.28 ± 0.05 cm; helix thickness, 0.31 ± 0.04 cm; the four‐point height of the helix, 0.52 ± 0.08 cm/0.51 ± 0.07 cm/0.46 ± 0.06 cm/0.41 ± 0.06 cm; and tragus height, 0.98 ± 0.15 cm. Conclusion These data may help beginners in reducing the learning curve of ear reconstruction. Framework fabrication based on these data allows attaining a harmonious ear framework and satisfactory three‐dimensional auricle outline, yielding acceptable results and few complications. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 133:569–575, 2023