1961
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(61)80187-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ear studies in the newborn infant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Keefe and Levi (1996), the maturation of the external and middle ear in infants aged from 0 to 6 months has significant effects on the interpretation of measured ear canal responses to acoustic stimuli. The developmental changes include a decrease in the mass of the middle ear from mesenchyme loss; changes in bone density; ossicular joint tightening; increases in the size of the external auditory canal, middle-ear cavity and mastoid; a lesser union between the stapes and the annular ligament; the fusing of the tympanic ring; a change in tympanic membrane orientation and flexibility; and, the formation of the bony portion of the ear canal wall (Eby & Nadol, 1986;Holte et al, 1991;Jaffe et al, 1970;Keefe et al, 1993;Keith, 1975;McLellan & Webb, 1957;Saunders et al, 1983). Given these developmental effects, tympanometric normative data at birth may not be identical to that obtained at a later date, such as 6Á7 weeks when a comprehensive audiological assessment is likely to be scheduled for neonates who fail their initial newborn screening.…”
Section: Sumariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Keefe and Levi (1996), the maturation of the external and middle ear in infants aged from 0 to 6 months has significant effects on the interpretation of measured ear canal responses to acoustic stimuli. The developmental changes include a decrease in the mass of the middle ear from mesenchyme loss; changes in bone density; ossicular joint tightening; increases in the size of the external auditory canal, middle-ear cavity and mastoid; a lesser union between the stapes and the annular ligament; the fusing of the tympanic ring; a change in tympanic membrane orientation and flexibility; and, the formation of the bony portion of the ear canal wall (Eby & Nadol, 1986;Holte et al, 1991;Jaffe et al, 1970;Keefe et al, 1993;Keith, 1975;McLellan & Webb, 1957;Saunders et al, 1983). Given these developmental effects, tympanometric normative data at birth may not be identical to that obtained at a later date, such as 6Á7 weeks when a comprehensive audiological assessment is likely to be scheduled for neonates who fail their initial newborn screening.…”
Section: Sumariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, since the shape of the audibility curve in adults is largely determined by the characteristics of the external and middle ears, and since at least some of these characteristics have been shown to change postnatally in humans (McLellan and Webb, 1957;Saunders et al, 1983), one might expect to see postnatal changes in sensitivity on that basis alone. Second, in other mammals, behavioral and physiological thresholds tend to mature first at low to middle frequencies (reviewed by Rubel, 1978 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there is no simple way of doing this at this age. Otoscopic examination is extremely difficult and often inaccurate6 7 and, although conventional tympanometry with a 220 Hz probe tone is still used to determine the presence of middle ear abnormalities in the neonate,8 the use of higher frequency (678 and 1000 Hz) probe tones has also been recommended 910 Unfortunately, these probe tone frequencies are not available on most tympanometers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%