“…Additionally, the lower premolar series is short with respect to the molar series (mean Lp3-4/Lm1-3 = 0.45), the probable absence of p1/d1 in adults (no corresponding alveoli are attested on the referred mandible), the reduction of p2 (curved paralophid without constriction, reduced paraconid, and closed posterior valley), the strongly reduced lingual and labial cingulids, and the developed external groove of the lower cheek teeth, impede referring the large rhino from Rickenbach to R. filholi or R. velaunum. Most morphological features aforementioned are consistent with those of R. romani (e.g., Heissig 1969;Brunet 1979;Becker 2009; Ménouret and Guérin 2009), however, being even more similar to the latest representatives of the concerned species, known from the latest Oligocene, as suggested by Brunet (1979) and Brunet et al (1987 According to Heissig (1969), Brunet (1979), and Ménouret and Guérin (2009), the available specimens show some similarities with those attributed to Ronzotherium romani (KRETZOI 1940), such as a continuous lingual cingulum joined to the anterior and posterior ones, a reduced labial cingulum, a distinct crista, and a wide postfossette on upper premolars. On P2, the protocone is less developed than the hypocone, and the M2s bear a strong antecrochet, as well as a simple crochet, and a crista.…”