Abstract:Background
The combination therapy of hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine has been proposed as a potential treatment in patients with sepsis and septic shock. However, subsequent trials have reported conflicting results in relation to survival outcomes. Hence, we performed this randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early combination therapy among adult patients with septic shock.
Methods
This single-center, do… Show more
“…We acknowledge some limitations. First of all, 10 RCTs [16,25,26,29,[31][32][33][36][37][38] were all singlecenter studies, which may result in selective bias, so as to obtain a large beneficial therapeutic effect conclusion. Second, RCTs in this meta-analysis used different doses of vitamin C. Most RCTs administered 1.5 g vitamin C every 6 h or 25 mg/kg every 6 h, whereas other RCTs administered 50 mg/kg every 6 h or 200 mg/kg daily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We initially identified 803 records, and 192 identical duplicate articles were deleted before screening; 582 studies were excluded by screening titles and abstracts; 11 studies were further removed during the assessment of the full text. Ultimately, 18 eligible RCTs [15][16][17][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] enrolling 3364 patients were included in this metaanalysis. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart of this study is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Eligible Studies and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No study administered a dose of < 25 mg/kg/d, 14 studies [16,17,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]37] (15 studies for short-term mortality [16, 17, 24-34, 36, 37]) administered 25-100 mg/ kg/d, and 3 studies [15,35,38] administered > 100 mg/ kg/d. 25-100 mg/kg/d IVVC administration was associated with reduced delta SOFA score (MD, − 0.85; 95% CI, − 1.23 to − 0.46; p < 0.0001; I 2 = 42%) and shortterm mortality (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; p = 0.03; I 2 = 36%) as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Subgroup Analysis Of Delta Sofa Score and Short-term Mortali...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study [32] analyzed sepsis patients. Ten studies [16,17,25,26,28,30,33,34,36,38] tested septic shock patient (9 studies for delta SOFA score [16,17,25,26,28,30,33,34,38]). Seven studies [15,24,27,29,31,35,37] analyzed unclear patients.…”
Background
To update a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and further explore the outcome of IV vitamin C (IVVC) administration in sepsis or septic shock patients.
Methods
This study is a meta-analysis of RCTs. The RCTs of vitamin C therapy in sepsis or septic shock were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and Clinical Trials.gov from inception to January 16, 2023. We registered the protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42022354875). The primary outcome was delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 72–96 h. Two reviewers independently assessed RCTs according to eligibility criteria: (1) study type: RCT; (2) patient population: patients ≥ 18 years with sepsis or septic shock; (3) intervention: IVVC at any doses as monotherapy or combined with thiamine or and hydrocortisone compared with standard of care, no intervention or placebo (defined as control group); (4) the RCT described short-term mortality or SOFA score. Then, two authors independently extracted related information from RCTs.
Results
Eighteen RCTs (n = 3364 patients) were identified in this meta-analysis. There were significant effects in the delta SOFA score from baseline to 72–96 h (MD, − 0.62; 95% CI, − 1.00 to − 0.25; p = 0.001) and the duration of vasopressor use (MD, − 15.07; 95% CI, − 21.59 to − 8.55; p < 0.00001) with IVVC therapy. Treatment with IVVC was not shown to improve short-term mortality (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.04; p = 0.14); nevertheless, dose at 25–100 mg/kg/d subgroup associated with a significant reduction in short-term mortality (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; p = 0.03). An increase adverse event was observed in IVVC therapy (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.68; p = 0.03).
Conclusion
In this meta-analysis, IVVC in sepsis or septic shock patients significantly improved delta SOFA score and reduced the duration of vasopressor use, whereas it was not associated with reduction in short-term mortality and had higher adverse events.
“…We acknowledge some limitations. First of all, 10 RCTs [16,25,26,29,[31][32][33][36][37][38] were all singlecenter studies, which may result in selective bias, so as to obtain a large beneficial therapeutic effect conclusion. Second, RCTs in this meta-analysis used different doses of vitamin C. Most RCTs administered 1.5 g vitamin C every 6 h or 25 mg/kg every 6 h, whereas other RCTs administered 50 mg/kg every 6 h or 200 mg/kg daily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We initially identified 803 records, and 192 identical duplicate articles were deleted before screening; 582 studies were excluded by screening titles and abstracts; 11 studies were further removed during the assessment of the full text. Ultimately, 18 eligible RCTs [15][16][17][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] enrolling 3364 patients were included in this metaanalysis. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart of this study is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Eligible Studies and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No study administered a dose of < 25 mg/kg/d, 14 studies [16,17,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]37] (15 studies for short-term mortality [16, 17, 24-34, 36, 37]) administered 25-100 mg/ kg/d, and 3 studies [15,35,38] administered > 100 mg/ kg/d. 25-100 mg/kg/d IVVC administration was associated with reduced delta SOFA score (MD, − 0.85; 95% CI, − 1.23 to − 0.46; p < 0.0001; I 2 = 42%) and shortterm mortality (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; p = 0.03; I 2 = 36%) as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Subgroup Analysis Of Delta Sofa Score and Short-term Mortali...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study [32] analyzed sepsis patients. Ten studies [16,17,25,26,28,30,33,34,36,38] tested septic shock patient (9 studies for delta SOFA score [16,17,25,26,28,30,33,34,38]). Seven studies [15,24,27,29,31,35,37] analyzed unclear patients.…”
Background
To update a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and further explore the outcome of IV vitamin C (IVVC) administration in sepsis or septic shock patients.
Methods
This study is a meta-analysis of RCTs. The RCTs of vitamin C therapy in sepsis or septic shock were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and Clinical Trials.gov from inception to January 16, 2023. We registered the protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42022354875). The primary outcome was delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 72–96 h. Two reviewers independently assessed RCTs according to eligibility criteria: (1) study type: RCT; (2) patient population: patients ≥ 18 years with sepsis or septic shock; (3) intervention: IVVC at any doses as monotherapy or combined with thiamine or and hydrocortisone compared with standard of care, no intervention or placebo (defined as control group); (4) the RCT described short-term mortality or SOFA score. Then, two authors independently extracted related information from RCTs.
Results
Eighteen RCTs (n = 3364 patients) were identified in this meta-analysis. There were significant effects in the delta SOFA score from baseline to 72–96 h (MD, − 0.62; 95% CI, − 1.00 to − 0.25; p = 0.001) and the duration of vasopressor use (MD, − 15.07; 95% CI, − 21.59 to − 8.55; p < 0.00001) with IVVC therapy. Treatment with IVVC was not shown to improve short-term mortality (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.04; p = 0.14); nevertheless, dose at 25–100 mg/kg/d subgroup associated with a significant reduction in short-term mortality (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; p = 0.03). An increase adverse event was observed in IVVC therapy (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.68; p = 0.03).
Conclusion
In this meta-analysis, IVVC in sepsis or septic shock patients significantly improved delta SOFA score and reduced the duration of vasopressor use, whereas it was not associated with reduction in short-term mortality and had higher adverse events.
“…En cuanto a la mortalidad a los 28 días, Liang H. et al(34), Lyu Q. et al(35), y Wen Y. et al(36), concuerdan que el uso de glucocorticoides en pacientes con shock séptico refractario no resultó en la disminución significativa de mortalidad en este período de tiempo. Venkatesh B. et al (37) y Lian X. et al(39), concuerdan que el uso de glucocorticoides acortan el tiempo de estancia en UCI y este último autor también asocia esta terapia con disminución de la estancia hospitalaria en pacientes con shock séptico refractario.…”
Antecedentes: La sepsis se define como un estado de disfunción multiorgánica como resultado de una repuesta inadecuada ante una infección sistémica, siendo la primera causa de muerte infecciosa a nivel mundial. Un pequeño grupo de pacientes con sepsis desarrolla shock séptico refractario, que se caracteriza por presentar hipotensión persistente con requerimiento de vasopresores para mantener una presión arterial media (PAM) adecuada y niveles elevados de lactato sérico a pesar de la reanimación con volumen adecuado. Esta condición se caracteriza por tener altas tasas de mortalidad que pueden alcanzar hasta el 40%, por lo que se ha propuesto el uso de glucocorticoides para revertir el estado de shock, sin embargo, todavía se desconoce el tipo, dosis y método de administración más adecuado. Objetivo general: Reunir evidencia científica sobre la utilidad de los glucocorticoides en pacientes adultos con shock séptico refractario ingresados en unidades de cuidados intensivos. Metodología: Se realizará una revisión bibliográfica de artículos científicos a texto completo, relacionados con el tema planteado con fecha de publicación desde el año 2017 al 2022. Se considerará además que tengan buen ranking (Q1-Q4) y no se discriminará el idioma de los mismos. Para la búsqueda bibliográfica se utilizarán términos MeSH junto con operadores boleanos. Por último, para la recolección de estudios se utilizará el diagrama PRISMA en sus cuatro fases, en el cual se describirá la totalidad de documentos científicos revisados. Resultados esperados: Se espera determinar que los glucocorticoides, específicamente hidrocortisona, en dosis bajas (200mg QD) administradas en bolos o infusión continua tienen la capacidad de reducir la mortalidad en pacientes con shock séptico refractario.
There has been increasing interest in the role of micronutrient supplementation in critical care. This narrative review summarizes the recent studies on micronutrients in critically ill patients. We searched two databases for primary randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of micronutrient supplementation in patients with critical illness published from January 2021 to August 2023. Personal files, reference lists of included studies, and previous reviews were also screened. Twelve studies reported on vitamin C, four studies on vitamin D, three studies on thiamin, two studies on multivitamins, and one study on cobalamin. The therapeutic effects of vitamin C appear mixed, although vitamin C monotherapy appears more promising than vitamin C combination therapy. Intramuscular administration of vitamin D appeared to lower mortality, mechanical ventilation duration, and intensive care unit stay, whereas enteral administration showed limited clinical benefits. Intravenous thiamin was not associated with improved outcomes in patients with septic shock or hypophosphatemia. Preliminary evidence suggests reduced vasopressor dose with cobalamin. Decreased disease severity and hospital stay in patients with COVID‐19 with vitamins A–E requires further investigation, whereas providing solely B‐group vitamins did not demonstrate therapeutic effects. It is currently premature to endorse the provision of high‐dose micronutrients in critical illness to improve clinical outcomes. This review may help to inform the design of future trials that will help better elucidate the optimal dosage and form of micronutrients, methods of administration, and subgroups of patients with critical illness who may most benefit.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.