2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03382-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early adoption of critical care interventions is unjustifiable without concomitant effectiveness study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, although phenotypes were found to be generalizable in our population (after validation), risk factors and characteristics that pre-de ned these clinical phenotypes were derived initially from data at ICU admission of a multicenter observational study in Spain. However, at the same time these risk factors are similar to those that have been reported by other investigators [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] which suggests its applicability to other populations. Despite this, our phenotypes should be validated into other critical patient populations to assess reproducibility and cross-application.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, although phenotypes were found to be generalizable in our population (after validation), risk factors and characteristics that pre-de ned these clinical phenotypes were derived initially from data at ICU admission of a multicenter observational study in Spain. However, at the same time these risk factors are similar to those that have been reported by other investigators [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] which suggests its applicability to other populations. Despite this, our phenotypes should be validated into other critical patient populations to assess reproducibility and cross-application.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Several limitations have been reported since its publication. 2 , 3 , 32 , 33 Possibly the most important limitations are the lack of an adjustment according to severity of illness to minimize potential bias and that mortality has been censored at 28 days, and no data have been published from the mortality at ICU or hospital discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although phenotypes were found to be generalizable in our population (after validation), risk factors and characteristics that pre-de ned these clinical phenotypes were derived initially from data at ICU admission of a multicenter observational study in Spain. However, at the same time these risk factors are similar to those that have been reported by other investigators [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] which suggests its applicability to other populations. Despite this, our phenotypes should be validated into other critical patient populations to assess reproducibility and cross-application.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This observation is contrary to the current recommendation of dexamethasone treatment according to the RECOVERY trial (8), that showed that the mortality from COVID-19 was lower among patients who were randomized to receive dexamethasone than among those who received the standard of care. Several limitations have been reported since its publication (2,3,32,33). Possibly the most important limitations are the lack of an adjustment according to severity of illness to minimize potential bias and that mortality has been censored at 28 days, and no data have been published from the mortality at ICU or Hospital discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%