2003
DOI: 10.1080/01650250244000218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early aesthetic choices: Infant preferences for attractive premature infant faces

Abstract: Previous studies have shown that when newborn and young infants are shown attractive and unattractive adult faces they will look longer at the attractive faces. Three studies with infants ranging from 5 months to 15 months were conducted to examine whether this attractiveness effect holds for infants looking at infant faces. A standard preferential looking technique was used in which infants were shown pairs of colour slides of upright (Experiments 1 and 2, n = 16) or inverted (Experiment 3, n = 16) infant fac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with a pattern in adults whereby attractive stimuli are viewed for a longer periods (40). A tendency to view attractive stimuli for longer is a generalized phenomenon that starts in infancy (41,42).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This finding is consistent with a pattern in adults whereby attractive stimuli are viewed for a longer periods (40). A tendency to view attractive stimuli for longer is a generalized phenomenon that starts in infancy (41,42).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…All pictures showed a frontally oriented, neutrally expressive face on a white background; head size was matched across stimuli. Face stimuli came from public domain databases (Nefian et al 1997; Peer, 2003; Solina, Peer, Batagelj, Juvan, & Kovac, 2003; Van Duuren, Kendell-Scott, & Stark, 2003) or were images taken by a professional photographer and edited by a private graphics company (Fulvia Riccardi). To exclude any potential influence of attractiveness (Parsons et al, 2011; Yamamoto et al, 2009), pictures were selected within a larger database ( n = 96 with the same characteristics and sources) and were similarly rated by 40 adults (20 females, M age = 25.19, SD = 2.11; 20 males, M age = 27.88, SD = 3.56) on a 7-point Likert scale assessing attractiveness, t (1, 38) =.63, ns .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equal numbers of cat and dog faces were used and their faces were also frontally oriented. Face stimuli came from public domain databases (Nefian et al 1997; Solina et al 2003), Van Duuren and colleagues (2003), or were publicly available images edited by a private graphics company (Tommaso Sega). To exclude potential influence of attractiveness on brain activity (Yamamoto et al 2009; Parsons et al 2011), pictures were selected within a larger database (n = 96 with the same characteristics and sources) and rated by 42 adults (19 males, M age = 32.00, SD = 4.25) on a 4-point Likert scale assessing attractiveness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%