“…that have been chronostratigraphically tied to the FAD of the conodont Chiosella timorensis (e.g., Muttoni et al, 1994Muttoni et al, , 1995Muttoni et al, , 1996Muttoni et al, , 1998Muttoni et al, , 2019Atudorei & Baud, 1997;Atudorei, 1999;Atudorei et al, 2002;Hounslow & McIntosh, 2003;Grădinaru et al, 2007;Galfetti et al, 2007;Horacek et al, 2007Horacek et al, , 2009Hounslow et al, 2007Hounslow et al, , 2008Hounslow & Muttoni, 2010;Burgess et al, 2014;Lehrmann et al, 2015a-b;Li M et al, 2018b;Haq, 2018;Huang, 2018;Maron et al, 2019;Zhang L et al, 2019a-b;Ogg, 2019;Ogg et al, 2020b;Ha et al, 2019Ha et al, , 2021, for which now there are firm data proving that this conodont is a defunct proxy for the Olenekian-Anisian/Early-Middle Triassic boundary, all of them must be chronostratigraphically re-calibrated. All of them have to be tied to the new OAB, based on the newly acquired ammonoid/conodont biochronolgy in the Deşli Caira section, North Dobrogea, Romania (Grădinaru, in Grădinaru & Gaetani, 2019;Golding, 2021a). Thus, the excursions of all physical events around the Olenekian-Anisian/Early-Middle Triassic boundary, which have been previously tied to the FAD of Ch.…”