INTRODUCTIONTotal knee replacement (TKR) is an extremely common operation with nearly 70,000 performed each year in the UK. 1 With an increasingly ageing population, demands for this surgical intervention are likely to rise. TKR has traditionally been carried out with the use of a tourniquet placed in a proximal thigh position and set to a pressure of 300 mmhg for either the entirety or part of the operation. The benefits of using a tourniquet are often quoted as a reduction in blood loss during the operation and a reduction in the operative time by allowing the surgeon a bloodless operative field.2,3 It is also thought to improve the cementing technique during prosthetic implantation as the bloodless field permits better penetration of cement into bone.4,5 However these presumptions have been questioned.
ABSTRACTBackground: Primary total knee replacement (TKR) has traditionally been carried out with the use of a tourniquet. More recent trends towards performing the surgery without a tourniquet have had some support in the literature and may improve patient recovery. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 198 consecutive primary TKRs from our institution were identified and analysed, 52 used a tourniquet and 146 did not. All TKRs also utilised a standardised interventions protocol including withholding of anticoagulants and antiplatelet medications, topical adrenaline injection, and both IV and topical tranexamic acid. Outcomes measured were estimated intra-operative blood loss, overall blood loss through comparison of pre and post-operative haemoglobin laboratory values, and the need for post-operative blood transfusion. Results: Analysis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in estimated intra-operative blood loss when a tourniquet was used (p<0.001). However, overall blood loss indicated by the haemoglobin drop after surgery was not significantly affected by tourniquet use (p=0.342). Transfusion requirements were also similar among the groups (4.8% vs. 5.8%) and no tendency was suggested towards an increased rate of transfusion in the non-tourniquet group. Conclusions: Our study shows that although estimated intra-operative blood loss is increased without a tourniquet, total blood loss as measured by haemoglobin levels is no different for primary TKRs that use a tourniquet and those that do not. Furthermore there is no difference in post-operative blood transfusion rates. It is our hope that this study will add to the body of evidence for surgeons to consider no longer using a tourniquet for primary TKR.