2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42208-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Childhood Education for Sustainable Development in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the Chinese Kindergarten Education Guideline (MOE, 2001) divides the kindergarten curriculum into five domains. Although ESD content has not been systematically integrated into the guideline, similar to the current national curriculum for young children in other Asian countries, such as South Korea (Park et al, 2016), there are many curriculum objectives that relate to ESD. For example, Article 30 of the Regulations for Work in the Kindergarten (MOE, 2016) states that “kindergartens should create an atmosphere of respect, acceptance, and love, and establish a good relationship among peers, as well as between teachers and children.” This reflects the social–cultural domain of ESD: a sustainable society is a just and inclusive society, reflecting the characteristics of participation, equality, and democracy, the development of that requires compassion, and respect for differences, equality, and justice (Zhou, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, the Chinese Kindergarten Education Guideline (MOE, 2001) divides the kindergarten curriculum into five domains. Although ESD content has not been systematically integrated into the guideline, similar to the current national curriculum for young children in other Asian countries, such as South Korea (Park et al, 2016), there are many curriculum objectives that relate to ESD. For example, Article 30 of the Regulations for Work in the Kindergarten (MOE, 2016) states that “kindergartens should create an atmosphere of respect, acceptance, and love, and establish a good relationship among peers, as well as between teachers and children.” This reflects the social–cultural domain of ESD: a sustainable society is a just and inclusive society, reflecting the characteristics of participation, equality, and democracy, the development of that requires compassion, and respect for differences, equality, and justice (Zhou, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Park et al, 2016), there are many curriculum objectives that relate to ESD. For example, Article 30 of the Regulations for Work in the Kindergarten (MOE, 2016) states that "kindergartens should create an atmosphere of respect, acceptance, and love, and establish a good relationship among peers, as well as between teachers and children."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, studies of early childhood sustainability and environmental education have made important contributions to sustainability, with contributions from Canada (Elliot & Krusekopf, 2017), Chile (Simonstein, 2016), China (Zhou, Liu, Han, & Wang, 2016), Kenya (Macharia & Kimani, 2016), Korea (Park, Shin, & Park, 2016), Norway (Heggen, 2016), Portugal (Folque & Oliveira, 2016), Sweden (Kultti, Larsson, Arlemalm-Hagser, & Pramling-Samuelsson, 2016), Turkey (Haktanir, Guler, & Ozturk, 2016), UK (Siraj-Blatchford, 2016), and the USA (Mogharreban & Green, 2016). What emerges is a plurality of pedagogical practices (Arlemalm-Hagser, 2017) for the development of a concept of sustainability (see Pramling Samuelsson & Park, 2017), with some international comparisons between early childhood educators (Japan, Australia and Korea) showing that traditional nature based approaches dominated (Inoue, O'Gorman, Davis, & Ji, 2017).…”
Section: Background Literature On Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ERS-SDEC measures both curriculum and pedagogic provisions for children aged from two-and-a-half to seven years, that are suitable for one classroom (OMEP, 2013). As of today, there is only one academic publication regarding progress in ERS-SDEC validation (S. Park & E. Park, 2014).…”
Section: Research Gaps and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%