2016
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early cognitive and linguistic profiles of different types of 7‐ to 8‐year‐old readers

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the early characteristics of four profiles of readers established in second grade (7-8 years of age): good readers, specific poor decoders, specific poor comprehenders and general poor readers. These profiles were compared retrospectively on a range of measures administered 2 years earlier, in kindergarten. These measures were based on factors known to be predictors of either decoding skills or comprehension performance. The results showed that children experiencing com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research should consider adding questions to better reflect the range of inferencing skills that are needed to understand the narrative (beyond those tapping into the characters’ mental states), including text-connecting, coherence, or text-based questions, for which answers can be found in-text (e.g., Cain et al, 2001 ), as well as gap-filling ( Norbury & Bishop, 2002 ) or elaborative questions, for which connections with background knowledge are required (e.g., Cain et al, 2001 ). We acknowledge inferential comprehension is a complex construct that relies on a wide range of language and cognitive skills (e.g., Dawes et al, 2018 ; Florit et al., 2011 ; Potocki et al, 2016 ; Silva & Cain, 2015 ). However, as our study was based on secondary analyses of data we were limited in the range of measures available which would have been valuable to explore as potential mechanisms, such as exposure to narratives (either classroom or speech pathology intervention), cognitive functioning (ToM, executive functioning, thinking, and reasoning), current nonverbal IQ, or more fine-grained measures of language and social-communication skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research should consider adding questions to better reflect the range of inferencing skills that are needed to understand the narrative (beyond those tapping into the characters’ mental states), including text-connecting, coherence, or text-based questions, for which answers can be found in-text (e.g., Cain et al, 2001 ), as well as gap-filling ( Norbury & Bishop, 2002 ) or elaborative questions, for which connections with background knowledge are required (e.g., Cain et al, 2001 ). We acknowledge inferential comprehension is a complex construct that relies on a wide range of language and cognitive skills (e.g., Dawes et al, 2018 ; Florit et al., 2011 ; Potocki et al, 2016 ; Silva & Cain, 2015 ). However, as our study was based on secondary analyses of data we were limited in the range of measures available which would have been valuable to explore as potential mechanisms, such as exposure to narratives (either classroom or speech pathology intervention), cognitive functioning (ToM, executive functioning, thinking, and reasoning), current nonverbal IQ, or more fine-grained measures of language and social-communication skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to non-parametric tests, profiles have been presented through statistical methods such as Z-score and chisquare test. As a statistic that measures the distance from the mean, Z score has been used to represent intergroup variations of language learners' ability (Potocki et al, 2017). Students' performance on a two-part reading comprehension test were transformed to Z-score, representing their decoding and comprehending abilities, respectively.…”
Section: Descriptive Approaches Of Building Linguistic Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the link between vocabulary and associated skills (i.e., language and literacy skills) would be bi-directional. For example, vocabulary in young French students from grade 2 seemingly predicts decoding and reading performance and conversely, performance in decoding would predict vocabulary performance (Potocki et al, 2016;Verhoeven et al, 2011). Further research is required to understand the role (causal or not (Quinn et al, 2015)), direct influence (Tunmer & Chapman, 2012) or indirect influence (Elwér et al, 2013;Ouellette & Beers, 2010), and the weight of vocabulary on associated skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%