Early control of C‐reactive protein levels with non‐biologics is associated with slow radiographic progression in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis

Abstract

Aim Predicting radiographic progression is vital for assessing the prognosis of patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, and C‐reactive protein (CRP) may be a valuable biomarker for this purpose. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between changes in the CRP level and spinal radiographic progression in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis who were initially treated with non‐biologics. Methods Patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis who were followed up for 18 years at a single center and initially treated with nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and/or conventional disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs for 3 months were included. Patients with a CRP level of <0.8 mg/dL or 50% of the baseline CRP at 3 months were assigned to the controlled CRP group (n = 351), and the remaining patients were assigned to the uncontrolled CRP group (n = 452). A generalized estimating equation was used to analyze the differences in the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) between the 2 groups. Results The increase in the mSASSS was slower in the controlled CRP group than in the uncontrolled CRP group (interaction term β = −.499, 95% confidence interval −0.699 to −0.300). Conclusion Controlled CRP achieved in response to initial treatment with non‐biologic agents for 3 months was significantly associated with a slower rate of spinal radiographic change in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. The CRP level at 3 months after initial non‐biologic treatment is a good predictor of radiographic progression.

Machine learning models with time-series clinical features to predict radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

“…Although disease activity, such as CRP or ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score, is known to be an important predictor of radiographic progression [25,26], it is not an absolute long-term factor in determining radiographic progression. For example, radiographic progression continues even when recurrent transient in ammations are actively controlled [27]. This evidence suggests that various factors in uence radiographic progression.…”

Adefovir‐induced hypophosphatemic osteochondrosis mimicks ankylosing spondylitis

“…Ju Zhang 1,2 Xiaojun Shi 3 Jing Wang 2,4 Jiaping Qi 2,5 Yixuan Li 2,4 Huan Jiang 2,4 Qiong Sun 2,4 Qinchen Gu 2,4 Chen Li 2,6 Zhenhua Ying 1,2,4,5…”

A pilot study on deep learning-based grading of corners of vertebral bodies for assessment of radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

“…The intra-observer reliability with consistency [intraclass coefficient (ICC) = 0.978, 95% CI, 0.976-0.979] and inter-observer reliability with agreement between the two readers were excellent (ICC = 0.946, 95% CI, 0.941-0.950). [12][13][14] The mSASSS was evaluated using the lateral view of the cervical and lumbar radiographs of the spine. The radiologist evaluated 12 anterior corners from the lower corner of the body of the second cervical vertebra to the upper corner of the body of the first thoracic vertebra and 12 anterior corners from the lower corner of the body of the 12th thoracic vertebra to the upper corner of the sacrum.…”