2021
DOI: 10.31035/cg2021023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Cretaceous deformation in the southern Tashkorgan region: Implications for the tectonic evolution of the northeastern Pamir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together, these domains are known as the Pamir-WK. The Cenozoic and pre-Cenozoic geological evolution of the Pamir-WK has been a topic of significant scientific focus over the past 20 years (Robinson et al, 2004;Cowgill, 2010;Li et al, 2020;Cai et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, these domains are known as the Pamir-WK. The Cenozoic and pre-Cenozoic geological evolution of the Pamir-WK has been a topic of significant scientific focus over the past 20 years (Robinson et al, 2004;Cowgill, 2010;Li et al, 2020;Cai et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With our interpreted Cretaceous motion along the regional Poshkharv thrust and related structures, Cretaceous crustal shortening is documented across the entire Northern Pamir. In the NE Pamir, Cretaceous crustal shortening and thickening has been primarily controlled by two regional structures: the NE-directed Shala-Tala thrust at ∼110-100 Ma in the north, and the SW-directed Torbashi-Baoziya-Rouluke thrust system at ∼125-105 Ma in the eastern Pamir (Cai et al, 2021;Imrecke et al, 2019;Robinson et al, 2004Robinson et al, , 2007. Moreover, amphibolite facies metamorphism in the Shala-Tala thrust hanging-wall documents regional crustal thickening in the NE Pamir from ∼125 to 110 Ma prior to exhumation along the Shala Tala thrust (Robinson et al, 2004).…”
Section: Cretaceous Crustal Shortening-thickening In the Pamir-karakorammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second period of deformation occurred during the Cretaceous and is interpreted to be the result of retroarc deformation during the northward subduction of the Neotethys Ocean (Chapman, Robinson et al, 2018;Robinson, 2015;Searle, 2011). Cretaceous crustal thickening and thrust faulting in the eastern Northern Pamir are documented by amphibolite facies metamorphism in the hanging-wall of the Shala-Tala thrust fault from ∼130 to 110 Ma followed by crustal shortening along the Shala Tala thrust from ∼110 to 100 Ma and the Torbashi thrust in the south from ∼120 to 100 Ma (Cai et al, 2021;Imrecke et al, 2019;Robinson et al, 2004Robinson et al, , 2007. To the south, moderate Cretaceous crustal deformation has been documented within the Southern Pamir fold-thrust belt from ∼110 to 90 Ma with ∼10% upper crustal shortening (Chapman, Robinson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Mesozoic Crustal Deformation In the Pamir-karakorammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A), formed due to the late Paleozoic-early Mesozoic accretion of the Kunlun, Karakul-Mazar, central Pamir, and southern Pamir terranes (Fig. 1B; Burtman and Molnar, 1993;Burtman, 2010;Robinson et al, 2004Robinson et al, , 2012Robinson, 2015;Angiolini et al, 2013;Villarreal et al, 2020;Chen et al, 2021;Li et al, 2022;Rembe et al, 2022) and the late Mesozoic-Cenozoic intracontinental deformation caused by northward subduction of the Neo-Tethys oceanic slab and subsequent collision of the Indian and Asian plates (Burtman and Molnar, 1993;Sobel and Dumitru, 1997;Robinson et al, 2004;Cowgill, 2010;Bershaw et al, 2012;Sobel et al, 2011Sobel et al, , 2013Cao et al, 2013a;Robinson, 2015;Rutte et al, 2017aRutte et al, , 2017bChapman et al, 2018;Worthington et al, 2020;Cai et al, 2021;Li et al, 2022;Villarreal et al, 2023). In this convergent setting, igneous and medium-to high-grade (575-830 °C/6-22 kbar) metamorphic rocks were initially exhumed in the early Miocene in the Pamir interior in a series of gneiss domes that formed by detachment faulting associated with ∼N-S extension (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%