2011
DOI: 10.21236/ada552789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Design Energy Analysis Using Building Information Modeling Technology

Abstract: With the advent of Military Construction (MILCON) Transformation, the responsibility for conducting energy modeling late in the design process falls solely on the Design/Build contractor or their consultants. This research utilized Building Information Modeling (BIM) for energy analysis during the conceptual design phase. Most building energy analyses are conducted later in the design process by energy analysts. This report describes a process of exploring different energy saving alternatives in early design u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the operational GHG emissions, a dynamic simulation approach was selected. The simulation software package Green Building Studio (GBS) (Autodesk 2019) was used due to its relevance for the early design stage (Stumpf, Kim, & Jenicek 2011).…”
Section: Methods For Quantifying Life-cycle Ghg Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the operational GHG emissions, a dynamic simulation approach was selected. The simulation software package Green Building Studio (GBS) (Autodesk 2019) was used due to its relevance for the early design stage (Stumpf, Kim, & Jenicek 2011).…”
Section: Methods For Quantifying Life-cycle Ghg Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The time saved from recreating the geometry could be better spent on alternative testing; therefore, value could be added to energy consulting (Moon, et al 2011, Stumpf, Kim andJenicek 2011). 3.…”
Section: The Benefits Of Bim-based Energy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there is ambiguity and uncertainty regarding the interoperability between BIM and BEM tools, as some critical information may be lost or misinterpreted during the process (Dong et al, 2007;Moon et al, 2011;Gourlis and Kovacic, 2017;Han et al, 2018;Solmaz, 2019). As emphasized by USGSA (2015), several BEM tools disregard construction and mechanical information, or lack the competence to verify the integrity of the model and completeness after being imported; these interoperability issues usually take place during certain phases of the process including, mapping data to the BIM file under certain file standards such as IFC or gbXML, mapping BIM data to a readable file for the BEM tool, and mapping data to the simulation engine (Kamel and Memari, 2019), which can lead to deceptive energy modeling results (Stumpf et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2018). Therefore, any attempt to standardize the data exchange process and its mechanism will significantly save time, reduce errors, and lead to overall process improvements (Hitchcock and Wong, 2011;Kamel and Memari, 2019).…”
Section: Review Of Interoperabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%