1991
DOI: 10.1002/cne.903040203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early development and innervation of taste bud‐bearing papillae on the rat tongue

Abstract: Early development of fungiform papillae on the fetal rat tongue was examined: (1) to determine whether morphogenesis of the taste bud-bearing fungiform papillae is induced by nerve and (2) to study the growth pattern of the two sensory nerves that innervate the papilla. The papillae first appear on the 15th day of gestation (E15; E1 is the day when the dam is sperm positive) in rows parallel to the midline sulcus. There appears to be a medial-lateral and an anterior-posterior gradient in the sequence of papill… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
169
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
21
169
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is possible that misexpression of SHH in lingual epithelium attracted gustatory and/ or somatosensory neurites, and hence ectopic taste bud formation would be secondary to SHH-directed innervation. This was decidedly not the case for gustatory innervation, as these nerves did not stray from their taste bud targets, consistent with the highly targeted development of taste bud innervation (Farbman and Mbiene, 1991;Lopez and Krimm, 2006). The anterior tongue is densely innervated by trigeminal somatosensory fibers, which in cross-innervation studies support taste buds in situ (Kinnman and Aldskogius, 1988).…”
Section: Shh-induced Ectopic Taste Buds Resemble Endogenous Taste Budmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, it is possible that misexpression of SHH in lingual epithelium attracted gustatory and/ or somatosensory neurites, and hence ectopic taste bud formation would be secondary to SHH-directed innervation. This was decidedly not the case for gustatory innervation, as these nerves did not stray from their taste bud targets, consistent with the highly targeted development of taste bud innervation (Farbman and Mbiene, 1991;Lopez and Krimm, 2006). The anterior tongue is densely innervated by trigeminal somatosensory fibers, which in cross-innervation studies support taste buds in situ (Kinnman and Aldskogius, 1988).…”
Section: Shh-induced Ectopic Taste Buds Resemble Endogenous Taste Budmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, the increase in taste papilla size driven by stabilized β-catenin is associated with increases in taste bud precursors (Shh + , Prox1 + ) and taste papilla epithelium (Ptch1 + ). During normal development, taste placodes are mitotically quiescent, whereas the adjacent taste papilla epithelium is highly proliferative (Farbman and Mbiene, 1991;Liu et al, 2013;Mbiene and Roberts, 2003;Okubo et al, 2006). Hence, we next addressed whether β-catenin activation expands embryonic taste papillae in part by triggering proliferation of mitotically silent placodes cellautonomously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first hypothesis posits a neural brain map that relates gustatory receptors to their orolingual position, enabling localization of stimulated taste receptors, analogous to the somatotopic or retinotopic neural maps. The second hypothesis posits that when a taste receptor cell is activated by a taste stimulus, it in turn activates adjacent tactile fibers, and the induced secondary tactile signal enables one to localize the stimulated region (Farbman & Mbiene, 1991;Whitehead & Kachele, 1994). The third hypothesis recognizes that most taste fibers are also mechanically and thermally sensitive (Hanamori, Hirota, & Ishiko, 1990;Matsuo et al, 1995;Ogawa, Hayama, & Yamashita, 1986;Ogawa, Imoto, & Hayama, 1984;Robinson, 1988;Travers & Norgren, 1995).…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms Of Taste Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%