1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990301)85:5<1018::aid-cncr2>3.3.co;2-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early diagnosis and treatment monitoring roles of tumor markers Cyfra 21‐1 and TPS in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many serum tumour markers have been examined to detect OSCC 12,15,18 , but unfortunately, up to now no specific tumour marker has been found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many serum tumour markers have been examined to detect OSCC 12,15,18 , but unfortunately, up to now no specific tumour marker has been found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case the main drawback of most of these markers was their relatively low sensitivity for head and neck carcinoma. However, recent data point to the suitability of the clinical use of two serum borne markers, TPS and particularly Cyfra 21-1 in the early detection of oral SCC lesions (primary, recurrent, or secondary) as well as for treatment monitoring [55]. Both markers are soluble forms of keratins in human sera that are relatively new in the field of monitoring cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus both markers were shown to have a dual role in diagnosis and treatment monitoring. These results may open new avenues for the diagnosis and follow-up of these patients and hopefully improve their treatment outcome [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Detecting multiple tumor markers s at early age facilitates diagnosis of cancer and treatment monitoring (Nagler et al, 1999;Duffy et al, 2003), and significantly improves the treatment efficiency and survival rates ( McMahon et al, 2000;Pantel et al, 2008). However, detecting only a single tumor maker is usually inadequate for an accurate diagnosis of cancer since most are not specific to a particular tumor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%