Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception

Abstract

Surface orientation is an important visual primitive that can be estimated from monocular or binocular (stereoscopic) signals. Changes in motor planning occur within about 200 ms after either type of signal is perturbed, but the time it takes for apparent (perceived) slant to develop from stereoscopic cues is not known. Apparent slant sometimes develops very slowly (Gillam, Chambers, & Russo, 1988; van Ee & Erkelens, 1996). However, these long durations could reflect the time it takes for the visual system to resolve conflicts between slant cues that inevitably specify different slants in laboratory displays (Allison & Howard, 2000). We used a speed–accuracy tradeoff analysis to measure the time it takes to discriminate slant, allowing us to report psychometric functions as a function of response time. Observers reported which side of a slanted surface was farther, with a temporal deadline for responding that varied block-to-block. Stereoscopic slant discrimination rose above chance starting at 200 ms after stimulus onset. Unexpectedly, observers discriminated slant from binocular disparity faster than texture, and for stereoscopic whole-field stimuli faster than stereoscopic slant contrast stimuli. However, performance after the initial deviation from chance increased more rapidly for slant-contrast stimuli than whole-field stimuli. Discrimination latencies were similar for slants about the horizontal and vertical axes, but performance increased faster for slants about the vertical axis. Finally, slant from vertical disparity was somewhat slower than slant from horizontal disparity, which may reflect cue conflict. These results demonstrate, in contradiction with the previous literature, that the perception of slant from disparity happens very quickly—in fact, more quickly than the perception of slant from texture—and in comparable time to the simple perception of brightness from luminance.

The Expression Patterns of Cytochrome Oxidase and Immediate-Early Genes Show Absence of Ocular Dominance Columns in the Striate Cortex of Squirrel Monkeys Following Monocular Inactivation

“…Alternatively, infragranular blob neurons may code non-disparity depth perception. 3-D depth perception does not only depend on binocular disparity, but also monocular cues, for example, the sense of perspective from blurriness of color, degree of defocus, speed of movement and overlap of objects (Caziot et al, 2017 ; McCann et al, 2018 ). Apparently, there are still many unknown circuits related to binocularity and depth perception, and blob-related functional architecture within the primate V1, but it is especially difficult to study these circuits in infragranular layers because optical imaging or multi-photon calcium imaging cannot access these layers.…”

Category and Depth Discrimination in Real-World Scenes

“…Luminance defined stimuli have a highly similar response latency of 203 msecs, indicating that both cues become available to motor systems at approximately the same time. Further, Caziot et al (2017) found that disparity cues inform judgements of surface slant more rapidly than texture gradient cues.…”

“…Although, prima facie, slant and depth describe different visual properties, they are intrinsically related: surface slant gives the variation in depth orthogonal to the axis of rotation, and, pooled estimates of local depth (e.g., from disparity) gives surface slant (see Gibson, 1950). Caziot et al (2017) found that the minimum response time required for above-chance judgements of surface slant is slower using texture gradient cues (~250 msecs), than using binocular disparity (210 msecs).…”

Coding of egocentric distance in the macaque ventral intraparietal area

“…Yet we found that in this area a majority of neurons are tuned to both disparity and vergence. Binocular disparities can be discriminated just as quickly as luminance 75,76 and are sufficient to sustain the orienting of attention in depth 77 . Furthermore at least in some circumstances, crossed (near) disparities more potently orient attention 78,79 .…”