2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2018.0169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early earth geodynamics: cross examining the geological testimony

Abstract: One contribution of 14 to a discussion meeting issue 'Earth dynamics and the development of plate tectonics'.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(177 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a regime over this timeframe is based on evidence from numerical modeling, geochemical data for either reworking or recycling of lithosphere, and restricted paleomagnetic data, the latter limited to the Juvenile Earth phase. If lateral motion in a squishy‐lid regime is valid, it must also be able to account for the spatially focused greenstone and TTG magmatic records of cratons that temporally extends over 100s of millions of years (Figure 11; e.g., Hickman, 2012; Kemp, 2018). The geochemical and isotopic signature of this magmatism indicates ongoing mantle input as well as crustal melting and reworking (e.g., Figure 13; Mulder et al., 2021).…”
Section: Future Directions (A Way Forward)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a regime over this timeframe is based on evidence from numerical modeling, geochemical data for either reworking or recycling of lithosphere, and restricted paleomagnetic data, the latter limited to the Juvenile Earth phase. If lateral motion in a squishy‐lid regime is valid, it must also be able to account for the spatially focused greenstone and TTG magmatic records of cratons that temporally extends over 100s of millions of years (Figure 11; e.g., Hickman, 2012; Kemp, 2018). The geochemical and isotopic signature of this magmatism indicates ongoing mantle input as well as crustal melting and reworking (e.g., Figure 13; Mulder et al., 2021).…”
Section: Future Directions (A Way Forward)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.50 Ga, the mafic and intermediate/felsic crustal reservoirs remained isotopically isolated from each other and from the mantle for at least 200 Ma. One possible implication is that mobile lid tectonics was not a global process during the Eo/Palaeoarchaean and that vertical tectonics remained predominant in the Pilbara area [87]. The tectonic settings of crustal evolution started to change only after 3.2 Ga, when signs of lateral movements that lead to the ceasing of the diapiric doming start to appear in the EPT [36,88].…”
Section: Palaeoarchaean Crustal Evolution In Pilbaramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobilitas ion juga dapat dihitung dengan menggunakan pengukurn yang sebenarnya antara jarak (206)(207)(208)(209)(210)(211)(212)(213)(214)(215) yang ditempuh setiap ion dengan waktu yang diperlukannya untuk menempuh jarak. =…”
Section: Konduktivitasunclassified