2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2012.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early education and health outcomes of a 2001 U.S. Birth Cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While our study found beneficial associations between HS participation and nutrition status, a recent study reported no differences (Belfield & Kelly, in press). This is notable given that both studies used the same data (i.e., the ECLS-B) and methods (i.e., propensity score-weighted regressions).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While our study found beneficial associations between HS participation and nutrition status, a recent study reported no differences (Belfield & Kelly, in press). This is notable given that both studies used the same data (i.e., the ECLS-B) and methods (i.e., propensity score-weighted regressions).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…This is notable given that both studies used the same data (i.e., the ECLS-B) and methods (i.e., propensity score-weighted regressions). One possible explanation is that the two studies used different ways to measure nutrition outcomes; while six dichotomized eating items (i.e., vegetables, fruits, sodas, fast foods, sweet snacks, and salty snacks) were individually used by Belfield and Kelly (in press), our study used two additional items (i.e., milk and 100% fruit juices) to create two continuous healthy and unhealthy eating scales. However, we note that another study using dichotomized individual eating items (as well as the same data and methods) reported improved nutrition status among children in CACFP-participating HS and other centers (Korenman et al, in press).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations