2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early emergence of deviant frontal fMRI activity for phonological processes in poor beginning readers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

7
45
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
7
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Forty native (Swiss-)German speaking kindergartners (mean age 6.4±0.3 years, 20 girls, 4 left-handed) took part in a larger longitudinal cross-over training study (also described elsewhere Brem et al, 2010) with two different non-commercial child-friendly, computerized training games (the "Graphogame" teaching grapheme-phoneme correspondences (Lyytinen et al, 2009;Lyytinen et al, 2007;Saine et al, 2011) and the control game teaching numbers and calculations (Räsänen et al, 2009)), behavioural and/or imaging sessions at kindergarten age and a behavioural follow-up in 2 nd grade. Nineteen of these children (mean age 6.4±0.3 years, 14 girls, all right-handed) were selected for the current analyses because they had completed both an EEG and an fMRI session including an explicit word/symbol processing task after 8 weeks of grapheme-phoneme training (Lyytinen et al, 2009;Lyytinen et al, 2007;Saine et al, 2011) with appropriate data quality and task performance.…”
Section: Study Design and Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Forty native (Swiss-)German speaking kindergartners (mean age 6.4±0.3 years, 20 girls, 4 left-handed) took part in a larger longitudinal cross-over training study (also described elsewhere Brem et al, 2010) with two different non-commercial child-friendly, computerized training games (the "Graphogame" teaching grapheme-phoneme correspondences (Lyytinen et al, 2009;Lyytinen et al, 2007;Saine et al, 2011) and the control game teaching numbers and calculations (Räsänen et al, 2009)), behavioural and/or imaging sessions at kindergarten age and a behavioural follow-up in 2 nd grade. Nineteen of these children (mean age 6.4±0.3 years, 14 girls, all right-handed) were selected for the current analyses because they had completed both an EEG and an fMRI session including an explicit word/symbol processing task after 8 weeks of grapheme-phoneme training (Lyytinen et al, 2009;Lyytinen et al, 2007;Saine et al, 2011) with appropriate data quality and task performance.…”
Section: Study Design and Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on children's assignment in the longitudinal cross-over training study, after the initial behavioural assessment the children had started either with a period of graphemephoneme or a control training for proper balancing of the cross-over training study (for details about the training procedure see (Brem et al, 2010)). This design allowed us to assess all children after a highly consistent and well-defined literacy training phase focusing on grapheme-phoneme correspondence rather than reading.…”
Section: Study Design and Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations