crush injury in two boys. Seven boys had an isolated urethral rupture, two also had a bladder neck injury and two also had a perforated bladder. No gross neurological impairment developed after trauma. Voiding cysto-urethrograms after initial therapy showed vesico-ureteric reflux in five boys, but in only one at the time of the urodynamic studies. At the time of urodynamic study, the mean ( SD ) age of the patients was 15 (6) years; seven were fully continent, one had intermittent leakage, two were incontinent, and one had nocturnal enuresis. CMG-electromyography (EMG) showed a reduced maximum cystometric capacity in nine patients, reduced compliance in 10, stable detrusor in 11, synergic detrusorsphincter activity in 11, and residual urine in one. The uroflowmetry-EMG study showed prolonged voiding time and flow time, decreased maximum flow urinary rate (Q max ) and mean flow rate (Q avg ). The shape of the flow curve showed an uninterrupted low-amplitude pattern.Comparing these patients with age-matched controls, CMG and uroflowmetry studies showed that the maximum cystometric bladder capacity, compliance, Q max and Q avg were all significantly lower in patients with PUD, while voiding time and flow time were significantly higher.
CONCLUSIONThe LUT deteriorates after treating PUD in boys. CMG and uroflowmetry findings are consistent with partial anatomical obstruction distal to the bladder. Our results are preliminary and full urodynamics, including pressure-flow studies, will be useful to support this conclusion. A urodynamic study should be integral in the management of PUD.