2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201218792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early evolution of the birth cluster of the solar system

Abstract: Context. The solar system was most likely born in a star cluster containing at least 1000 stars. It is highly probable that this cluster environment influenced various properties of the solar system such as its chemical composition, size, and the orbital parameters of some of its constituting bodies. Aims. In the Milky Way, clusters with more than 2000 stars only form in two types -starburst clusters and leaky clusters -, each following a unique temporal development in the mass-radius plane. The aim is here to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(109 reference statements)
4
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This change was already noticed in the context of the influence of encounters on protoplanetary discs (Olczak et al 2010;Duke & Krumholz 2012;Olczak et al 2012;Pfalzner 2013). It was found there that parabolic encounters with low-mass stars (<0.5 M ) and the few most massive stars of the system dominate at mean cluster densities of ≈10 3 pc −3 .…”
Section: Nature Of the Encounter-induced Mass Lossmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This change was already noticed in the context of the influence of encounters on protoplanetary discs (Olczak et al 2010;Duke & Krumholz 2012;Olczak et al 2012;Pfalzner 2013). It was found there that parabolic encounters with low-mass stars (<0.5 M ) and the few most massive stars of the system dominate at mean cluster densities of ≈10 3 pc −3 .…”
Section: Nature Of the Encounter-induced Mass Lossmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Unfortunately, this result for an encounter between equal-mass stars has been applied in a number of studies (Adams et al 2006;Adams 2010;Malmberg et al 2011;Jiménez-Torres et al 2011;Pfalzner 2013;Rosotti et al 2014) to non-equal mass encounters where it is not valid (Breslau et al 2014). Pfalzner et al (2005b) investigated the dependence of the disk size on the mass ratio for the case of a parabolic, coplanar, prograde encounter at different periastron distances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the above results are often generalised as encounters truncating discs to 1/2-1/3 of the periastron distance (e.g. Brasser et al 2006;Adams et al 2006;Adams 2010;Jiménez-Torres et al 2011;Malmberg et al 2011;Pfalzner 2013). There the dependence of the disc truncation on the mass of the perturbing star and other geometrical properties of the perturber orbit are disregarded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%