2014
DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.13-00110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Experience with the Endowedge Technique and Snorkel Technique for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with Challenging Neck Anatomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heterogeneity of existing data is evident from the wide range of overall mortality. Overall mortality of patients with visceral CGs has been reported as 0%, 14 5%, 7 14%, 19 16%, 20 and 57%. 23 The corresponding data for thoracic CGs have been reported as 5%, 35 17%, 32 68%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneity of existing data is evident from the wide range of overall mortality. Overall mortality of patients with visceral CGs has been reported as 0%, 14 5%, 7 14%, 19 16%, 20 and 57%. 23 The corresponding data for thoracic CGs have been reported as 5%, 35 17%, 32 68%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chimney EVAR deploys parallel stents into the visceral branches, which could otherwise be covered by the adjacent aortic endograft. 6 , 7 This technique has become more popular, especially in urgent cases, when commercial custom-manufactured devices are unavailable. However, limited reports describe IMA chimney stenting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other authors have suggested that bare stents are not inferior to covered stents with regard to renal patency and protection against type Ia ELs [ 9 ]. We have reported good results in the exclusion of AAAs with challenging neck anatomy by EVAR procedures [ 10 ] and JRAAs using bare chimney stents [ 11 ]. Furthermore, we can only use bare stents for Ch-EVAR because covered stents are not covered by Japanese National Health Insurance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most reports recommended that a new neck length of >20 mm was necessary in order to avoid type Ia ELs [ 6 , 12 ]. Thus, we planned a new neck length of >10 mm with a bare stent, which led to the acceptable outcomes of our previous report [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%