2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Failure of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Leading to Revision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
111
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
111
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides MTC, we noted femoral component loosening in 4 patients, and femoral component fracture in 1 patient. In cases of MTC, bony defects were significantly greater, and implant requirements were more increased than in cases of other modes of failures (8). We noted MTC in all of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Besides MTC, we noted femoral component loosening in 4 patients, and femoral component fracture in 1 patient. In cases of MTC, bony defects were significantly greater, and implant requirements were more increased than in cases of other modes of failures (8). We noted MTC in all of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The reasons for the revision of UKA to TKA are the followings: component loosening (8,23), progressive arthritis in patellofemoral joint (9,10) in lateral tibiofemoral joint (17,24), PE wear (8,25), tibia plateau fracture, stress fracture (10,25), infection (2,26), and persistent pain (17,26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Improper patient selection and biomechanically unfavourable implant design have both been implicated. However, inaccurate implant positioning and secondary mechanical-axis malalignment appear to be the most common technical errors compromising the longevity of the implant [6,7]. Proper alignment of both implant components has been shown to be the major limiting factor during medial UKA, accounting for early failure of the implant [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%