Early Forage Biomass and Sward Structures of Native Warm-Season Grasses Established at Different Seedling Densities

Abstract

Effects of transplanted seedling density and species on sward structure of native warm-season grass (NWSG) stands were compared in a randomized complete block design. About 6-week-old NWSG (big bluestem (BB, Andropogon gerardii Vitman), eastern gamagrass (GG, Tripsacum dactyloides L.), indiangrass [IG, Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash] and switchgrass (SG, Panicum virgatum) seedlings were transplanted in 45-cm wide rows on clean-tilled seedbeds. Within-row spacing was 30, 25, or, 20 cm giving 10, 12, and 15 plants m −2 as low, medium, and high seedling density, respectively. During establishment, the stands were allowed uninterrupted first year growth without fertilizers or irrigation but when necessary, tall-growing broadleaf weeds were mechanically removed. In the following spring, all dead standing biomass was mowed down to allow emerging tillers access to sunlight. During the second year after planting, early-spring basal diameters, row-length intercepted by the NWSG crowns, midsummer sward heights, and percentage bare ground were determined. From the second June after planting, and for two consecutive years, plots were harvested twice year −1 to assess forage biomass. Data showed that, unlike species, seedling density had no effect on the assessed parameters. Cumulative forage biomass, in kg DM ha −1 , was the least for GG (4901) at low and the most (18,245) for SG at high seedling density during the second year. Corresponding values for the third year were 4500 and 7799 kg DM ha −1. Basal diameters ranged from 18 cm (BB) to 24 cm (IG) while percent row intercepts were from 6 (GG) to 46 (IG) with sward heights measuring 41 cm (IG) to 54 cm (GG). In each stand, percent ground cover by the NWSGs, and at every seedling density, averaged 60.5. Transplanting at

Evaluation of eastern gamagrass as dual‐purpose complementary bioenergy and forage feedstock to switchgrass

“…Our results of lower mean biomass yield of GG than SG were consistent with Backus et al (2017) who reported that SG produced ~7-8 Mg ha −1 while GG produced ~4-6 Mg ha −1 . Similarly, Temu et al (2018) reported SG biomass of 7.2 and 5.0 Mg ha −1 for GG. Switchgrass biomass can vary greatly in the literature, for example, ranging from as low as 1 Mg ha −1 to as high as 40 Mg ha −1 , because of differences in the varieties and ecotypes, agricultural practices, and harvesting stages used across different studies (Wullschleger et al, 2010).…”