2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early glottic cancer recurrence: A critical review on its current management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 183 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this procedure is associated with long postoperative recovery time and changes in laryngeal function to a variable extent. 3 Numerous studies indicate the benefits of using low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation technology in the field of head, neck, ear, nose and throat, since it is associated with less trauma and bleeding and fast postoperative recovery. In recent years, low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation was used as laryngeal minimally invasive surgery to treat early glottis carcinoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this procedure is associated with long postoperative recovery time and changes in laryngeal function to a variable extent. 3 Numerous studies indicate the benefits of using low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation technology in the field of head, neck, ear, nose and throat, since it is associated with less trauma and bleeding and fast postoperative recovery. In recent years, low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation was used as laryngeal minimally invasive surgery to treat early glottis carcinoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current evidence is poor to drive medical decisions. The controversies come from positive results of studies with low quality and with significant limitations comparing both modalities 7,8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controversies come from positive results of studies with low quality and with significant limitations comparing both modalities. 7,8 In 2014, Warner et al conducted a Cochrane systematic review to determine if S or RT would better treat early-stage glottic cancer (EGC). 8 The systematic review identified only one randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing RT and S. 8 The conclusion was that although the RCT had shown no significant difference in survival, the interpretation was limited because of concerns about shortcomings in the study design and analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early glottic cancer (EGC) is commonly defined as a squamous-cell carcinoma that does not extend beyond the true vocal cords or impair their motion, and without any clinical or radiological evidence of cervical node involvement [1]. According to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC)'s tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system, EGC corresponds to the T1aN0M0, T1bN0M0 (stage I), and T2N0M0 (stage II) lesions [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC)'s tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system, EGC corresponds to the T1aN0M0, T1bN0M0 (stage I), and T2N0M0 (stage II) lesions [2]. Oncological outcomes for EGC are known to be excellent, with reported 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of over 80-90% [1,3,4]. Exclusive radiotherapy (RT) or surgery, mostly in the form of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM), are the two main primary treatment options, with comparable results in terms of survival even in the most recent series [1,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%