2021
DOI: 10.5194/hess-25-2895-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early hypogenic carbonic acid speleogenesis in unconfined limestone aquifers by upwelling deep-seated waters with high CO<sub>2</sub> concentration: a modelling approach

Abstract: Abstract. Here we present results of digital modelling of a specific setting of hypogenic carbonic acid speleogenesis (CAS). We study an unconfined aquifer where meteoric water seeps through the vadose zone and becomes saturated with respect to calcite when it arrives at the water table. From below, deep-seated water with high pCO2 and saturated with respect to calcite invades the limestone formation by forced flow. Two flow domains arise that host exclusively water from the meteoric or deep-seated source. The… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the water composition is clearly a mixture of two components, the positive correlation in δ 18 O cc − δ 13 C cc space cannot be explained by calcite precipitation due to mixing of two fluids. First, the two fluids will need to be highly saturated in calcite, as mixing of two fluids saturated in calcite at different equilibrium concentrations of Ca 2+ produces a mixture with lower calcite saturation due to the curvature of the calcite equilibrium line, that will lead to calcite dissolution (i.e., mixing corrosion) 70 72 . Second, the very small change observed in the δ 13 C cc values would require two fluids of such contrasting origin, such as meteoric and deep-seated, to have similar carbon isotopic composition, which is highly unlikely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the water composition is clearly a mixture of two components, the positive correlation in δ 18 O cc − δ 13 C cc space cannot be explained by calcite precipitation due to mixing of two fluids. First, the two fluids will need to be highly saturated in calcite, as mixing of two fluids saturated in calcite at different equilibrium concentrations of Ca 2+ produces a mixture with lower calcite saturation due to the curvature of the calcite equilibrium line, that will lead to calcite dissolution (i.e., mixing corrosion) 70 72 . Second, the very small change observed in the δ 13 C cc values would require two fluids of such contrasting origin, such as meteoric and deep-seated, to have similar carbon isotopic composition, which is highly unlikely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%