1991
DOI: 10.1080/03014469100001472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early influences on the secular change in adult height between the parents and children of the 1958 birth cohort

Abstract: The present account is of data available from the 1958 British national birth cohort and its follow-up to the age of 23 years. It shows an increase in adult height between the cohort members and their parents, amounting to an average 1.2 +/- 0.11 (SEM) cm between the daughters and their mothers and 3.0 +/- 0.12 cm between the sons and their fathers. Factors in early life which contributed jointly to a significant increase in adult height included, as well as sex and parental height, birthweight and maternal pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no differences in prevalent diabetes, insulin resistance or other metabolic risk factors between women who provided details of their birth weight and those who did not (all p values >0.1). The age adjusted Pearson's correlation coefficients (95% CI) for the association between selfreported birth weight and current height (0.25; 0.19, 0.30) weight (0.12; 0.06, 0.17), BMI (0.02; -0.04, 0.07) and waist-to-hip ratio (-0.04; -0.09, 0.02) in those with self-reported birth weights were all in the same direction and of a similar magnitude to those reported in studies comparing birth weights from hospital records to adult anthropometric measurements in western populations [18,19]. Self-reported birth weight was also positively associated with both leg length and trunk length-age adjusted Pearson's correlation coefficient for the association between birth weight and leg length 0.15 (0.11, 0.19) and between birth weight and trunk length 0.16 (0.11, 0.02).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…There were no differences in prevalent diabetes, insulin resistance or other metabolic risk factors between women who provided details of their birth weight and those who did not (all p values >0.1). The age adjusted Pearson's correlation coefficients (95% CI) for the association between selfreported birth weight and current height (0.25; 0.19, 0.30) weight (0.12; 0.06, 0.17), BMI (0.02; -0.04, 0.07) and waist-to-hip ratio (-0.04; -0.09, 0.02) in those with self-reported birth weights were all in the same direction and of a similar magnitude to those reported in studies comparing birth weights from hospital records to adult anthropometric measurements in western populations [18,19]. Self-reported birth weight was also positively associated with both leg length and trunk length-age adjusted Pearson's correlation coefficient for the association between birth weight and leg length 0.15 (0.11, 0.19) and between birth weight and trunk length 0.16 (0.11, 0.02).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…12 Furthermore, birth weight category distributions and association between birth weight and adult height 11 were similar to those observed in the 1958 British cohort. 12,13 Therefore, the following results are for volunteers with birth weights between 800 and 5000 g. However, the results were similar when all of the data were included or participants with a high likelihood of having been born prematurely (birth weight Ͻ1500 g) were excluded.…”
Section: Validating Recalled Birth Weightsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…17 BT birth weight category distributions and the association between birth weight and adult height (3.8-cm increase in adult height per 1-kg increase in birth weight) were consistent with 1958 cohort findings (3.2-cm increase in adult height per 1-kg increase in birth weight). 18 This article reports the findings for participants with birth weights between 800 and 5000 g (although results are similar if all data are included). Repeat analysis excluding participants thought to have been born prematurely (Ͻ1500 g) also gave similar results.…”
Section: Validating Recalled Birth Weightsmentioning
confidence: 92%