Early Interventions Following Exposure to Traumatic Events: Implications for Practice From Recent Research

Abstract

It is has been argued that early interventions for individuals, groups or others affected by traumatic events should not be routinely offered as there is the danger of causing more harm. The notion of ''watchful waiting'' has been espoused in clinical guidelines for the assessment and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Instead, a more proactive early intervention is suggested for potentially traumatic events that have the potential to lead to high psychic distress, PTSD, or complicated grief reactions for a significant number of those affected. This involves providing strategies tailored to the needs of these individuals and families and not providing conventional individual therapeutic interventions. Early intervention is wise as recent research has demonstrated that early misconceptions and negative appraisals about one's own reactions to a trauma can be significant in the development and maintenance of posttraumatic reactions and early intervention may help in forming adequate appraisals, thus counteracting misunderstandings and misperceptions. Adopting a ''watchful waiting'' approach with individuals and families has the potential to hinder and impede their longer-term coping responses. Recent advances, especially in the field of memory research, have implications for early interventions. We present recent findings, which make the case for early interventions following exposure to traumatic events.

The role of associative learning and fear in the development of chronic pain – a comparison of chronic pain and post-traumatic stress disorder

“…[151][152][153] These studies reinforce hippocampal research demonstrating that lesions to the Hip in the first 30 days after a negative event will eliminate the memory of the event, but lesions applied after the 30 days will fail to eliminate the memory, suggesting that traumatic memories are transferred from the Hip to long-term storage in other cortical sites (the mPFC, ACC, and IC) after 30 days. 154 Early psychological intervention has shown lower PTSD symptoms with psychiatric and counseling intervention in the emergency room 155 and progressive care after hospitalization.…”

Children and war: the work of the Children and War Foundation

“…Received wisdom suggests that early intervention should be better than delayed intervention. However, there is now some evidence that if the intervention is too early, it may disrupt natural healing processes in adults (e.g., Dyregrov & Regel, 2012; Mayou, Ehlers, & Hobbs, 2000) and appears ineffective in preventing persistent PTSD symptoms when used with children (e.g., Stallard et al, 2006; Zehnder, Meuli, & Landolt, 2010). In contrast to single session early interventions for all trauma-exposed children, a screen-and-intervene approach in which a more intense multi-session early intervention is provided for symptomatic children appears promising (Berkowitz, Stover, & Marans, 2011).…”

Evaluation of a Group-Based Resilience Intervention for Typhoon Haiyan Survivors

“…A review of literature on intervention programs revealed that engaging survivors in distracting or enjoyable activities, the presence of caring helpers, and adequate provision of information promotes calm, reduces anxiety, and promotes recovery (Dryregrov & Regel, 2012). Given robust evidence on the protective role of social support, Dryregrov and Regel (2012) also advocate for the provision of 'structured social support' .…”

“…Rather than wait for the onset of PTSD, Dryregrov and Regel (2012) suggest the need for early interventions to help survivors correct maladaptive thoughts and behaviours that may have enduring impact. The past years have seen an increasing number of MHPSS interventions designed to help survivors experiencing difficulties postdisaster.…”