Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on coronary collateral blood flow has not been clarified. We examined the acute effects of beta-adrenergic blockade on coronary collateral blood flow. Fifteen patients (Part A) with stable angina were studied while undergoing coronary angioplasty. According to the protocol, all patients underwent a minimum of three balloon inflations. Collateral flow velocity was determined during balloon inflations using the Doppler flow guidewire positioned distally to the lesion. The two tested balloon inflations, the second and third, were maintained for the same length of time. Between the second and third balloon inflations, 1 mg of propranolol was administered IC into the treated artery. Ten controls were studied following saline infusion. In 10 other patients (Part B), the effect of 1 mg IC propranolol on the coronary artery area distal to the lesion was studied, and five patients served as controls. In the treated group, in Part A blood pressure remained stable during the balloon inflations tested. Heart rate decreased from 79 +/- 11 to 73 +/- 12 beats/min (P < .05), velocity time integral from 9.6 +/- 8.2 to 6.6 +/- 4.1 cm (P < .05), and ST elevation from 1.3 +/- .9 to .9 +/- 1.0 mV (P < .05) between the second and third balloon inflations. In the controls the variables examined did not change during the balloon inflations tested. In Part B, neither propranolol nor normal saline had any significant effect on coronary artery lumen area. Thus, IC administration of beta-adrenergic blockade decreases coronary collateral blood flow, and this potentially worsens the ischemic zone. However, beta-adrenergic blockade ameliorates myocardial ischemia during coronary angioplasty.
The effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on coronary collateral blood flow has not been clarified. We examined the acute effects of beta-adrenergic blockade on coronary collateral blood flow. Fifteen patients (Part A) with stable angina were studied while undergoing coronary angioplasty. According to the protocol, all patients underwent a minimum of three balloon inflations. Collateral flow velocity was determined during balloon inflations using the Doppler flow guidewire positioned distally to the lesion. The two tested balloon inflations, the second and third, were maintained for the same length of time. Between the second and third balloon inflations, 1 mg of propranolol was administered IC into the treated artery. Ten controls were studied following saline infusion. In 10 other patients (Part B), the effect of 1 mg IC propranolol on the coronary artery area distal to the lesion was studied, and five patients served as controls. In the treated group, in Part A blood pressure remained stable during the balloon inflations tested. Heart rate decreased from 79 +/- 11 to 73 +/- 12 beats/min (P < .05), velocity time integral from 9.6 +/- 8.2 to 6.6 +/- 4.1 cm (P < .05), and ST elevation from 1.3 +/- .9 to .9 +/- 1.0 mV (P < .05) between the second and third balloon inflations. In the controls the variables examined did not change during the balloon inflations tested. In Part B, neither propranolol nor normal saline had any significant effect on coronary artery lumen area. Thus, IC administration of beta-adrenergic blockade decreases coronary collateral blood flow, and this potentially worsens the ischemic zone. However, beta-adrenergic blockade ameliorates myocardial ischemia during coronary angioplasty.
Background-Improved recognition of stroke signs and symptoms has paralleled the development of pharmacological strategies that may be examined to reduce stroke mortality and morbidity. Presently, tissue plasminogen activator is the only therapy that significantly improves outcome in acute stroke, with no agent demonstrating a significant reduction in mortality. Summary of Review-Antiplatelet agents are a heterogenous class of drugs that have been successfully used for more than 2 decades in secondary stroke prevention. These agents include aspirin, with or without dipyridamole, and more recently, the adenosine antagonists ticlopidine and clopidogrel. However, studies of the use of antiplatelet agents within 48 hours of the ictus have examined only aspirin. Only 1 study, the Multicentre Acute Stroke Trial-Italy (MAST-I), entered patients within 6 hours of the ictus. These data suggest that an improvement in mortality may be related to the speed of administration. No significant adverse events were noted with early antiplatelet monotherapy. However, MAST-I did note a significant increase in early mortality in patients receiving aspirin plus streptokinase, a finding not adequately explained by an increase in the intracranial hemorrhage rate. Conclusions-The use of antiplatelet therapy in acute stroke, clinical or experimental, has only recently received attention.It is likely that the use of antiplatelet agents for acute stroke therapy will be less restrictive than that currently seen for thrombolytics. Future studies should include an examination of those agents that have previously demonstrated efficacy in secondary stroke prevention, most notably, aspirin. The recognition that all platelet stimuli share a final common pathway that is dependent on the surface glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (fibrinogen) receptor has resulted in the development of various agents which block this receptor and are currently the focus for clinical trials. The role of nitric oxide in stroke therapy will depend on minimizing the hypotensive side effects of this agent. Stroke models are needed to provide preliminary data on the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy, especially as relates to the interaction of antiplatelet agents with thrombolytics. (Stroke. 1999;30:887-893.)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.