2015
DOI: 10.1177/2048872615590145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early invasive versus early conservative strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: An outcome research study

Abstract: In a real-life registry of all-comers NSTEACS patients, ECS was non-inferior to EIS; however, when EIS was applied according to clinical judgement, a reduction of clinical events at one year was demonstrated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(8) Elevation variation coefficient Elevation variation coefficient (Figure 2h) can be expressed as the ratio of the standard deviation of elevations to their average value in a certain area. This terrain factor is in direct proportion to the terrain complexity [52,53].…”
Section: ) Elevationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8) Elevation variation coefficient Elevation variation coefficient (Figure 2h) can be expressed as the ratio of the standard deviation of elevations to their average value in a certain area. This terrain factor is in direct proportion to the terrain complexity [52,53].…”
Section: ) Elevationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing medical care must be continued until stabilization of higher risk features with conservative therapy as the mean age of the patients in the study is relatively high. These patients take a great benefit from a more aggressive antiplatelet and antithrombotic regimen and an early invasive strategy than the patients with a lower risk (Hoedemaker et al, 2017, Tubaro et al, 2017.…”
Section: Table 2: Electrocardiographic and Echocardiographic Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an Italian registry, an early invasive strategy provided no benefit in outcome compared to an early conservative strategy performed at non-PCI capable hospitals intriguingly independent of the GRACE risk score. 2 However, on per protocol analysis an early invasive strategy was superior indicating that cardiologists are very able to clinically risk stratify patients for early transfer to a PCI-capable hospital. On the other hand, the decision to perform early coronary angiography can already be taken in the pre-hospital setting based on the EKG and point of care troponin measurement as is demonstrated by a preliminary report from the in Denmark ongoing randomized acute versus subacute angioplasty in patients with NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NONSTEMI) trial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%