2013
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310163110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early-life stress has persistent effects on amygdala function and development in mice and humans

Abstract: Relatively little is known about neurobiological changes attributable to early-life stressors (e.g., orphanage rearing), even though they have been associated with a heightened risk for later psychopathology. Human neuroimaging and animal studies provide complementary insights into the neural basis of problem behaviors following stress, but too often are limited by dissimilar experimental designs. The current mouse study manipulates the type and timing of a stressor to parallel the early-life stress experience… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

17
176
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
17
176
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this, an alternative limited-bedding paradigm was initially developed in rats (Gilles et al, 1996), obviating the requirement for overt separation of pups and dams typically used in rodent ELS models . This paradigm induces inconsistent and fragmented maternal care (Heun-Johnson and Levitt, 2016), which has since been validated and adopted for use with mice by multiple laboratories Wang et al, 2011Wang et al, , 2013Gunn et al, 2013;Malter Cohen et al, 2013;Liao et al, 2014;Kohl et al, 2015;Naninck et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2015;Arp et al, 2016;Bath et al, 2016Bath et al, , 2017Liu et al, 2016;McIlwrick et al, 2016McIlwrick et al, , 2017Yam et al, 2017). The paradigm provides an ethologically relevant framework for addressing heritability of risk-, sex-, and developmentally dependent influences that determine outcomes following ELS.…”
Section: Neurobiological Signatures Of Windows Of Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, an alternative limited-bedding paradigm was initially developed in rats (Gilles et al, 1996), obviating the requirement for overt separation of pups and dams typically used in rodent ELS models . This paradigm induces inconsistent and fragmented maternal care (Heun-Johnson and Levitt, 2016), which has since been validated and adopted for use with mice by multiple laboratories Wang et al, 2011Wang et al, , 2013Gunn et al, 2013;Malter Cohen et al, 2013;Liao et al, 2014;Kohl et al, 2015;Naninck et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2015;Arp et al, 2016;Bath et al, 2016Bath et al, , 2017Liu et al, 2016;McIlwrick et al, 2016McIlwrick et al, , 2017Yam et al, 2017). The paradigm provides an ethologically relevant framework for addressing heritability of risk-, sex-, and developmentally dependent influences that determine outcomes following ELS.…”
Section: Neurobiological Signatures Of Windows Of Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover perinatal maternal anxiety affects early development of the hippocampus (Qiu et al, 2013), and a history of childhood trauma is manifested as a smaller hippocampal volume in women with major depression (Vythilingam et al, 2002). Early-life stress also induces persistent alterations in amygdala circuitry and function in mice and humans (Malter Cohen et al, 2013).…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the central nervous system is equipped with several sensing mechanisms to identify stress, as well as processes to respond to stressful signals and be modified by them. Cognitive brain networks, including those centered on the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex regions involved in emotional processes, such as amygdala and the nucleus accumbens, as well as network involved in social behaviors, appear to be particularly vulnerable to the effects of stress (Kim and Diamond, 2002;Joëls and Baram, 2009;Lupien et al, 2009;Malter Cohen et al, 2013;Sandi and Haller, 2015). Important parameters that govern the effects of stress on brain functions include the context and nature of the stress (Zoladz and Diamond, 2008;Joëls and Baram, 2009;McEwen and Gianaros, 2011;Schwabe et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%