Early mobilisation by head-up tilt with stepping versus standard care after severe traumatic brain injury – Protocol for a randomised clinical feasibility trial

Gluud

Jakobsen

et al. 2019

Preprint

Self Cite

Background: Early mobilisation on a tilt table with stepping versus standard care may be beneficial for patients with severe brain injury, but data from randomised clinical trials are lacking. Methods: This detailed statistical analysis plan describes the analyses of data collected in a randomised clinical feasibility trial for early mobilisation by head-up tilt with stepping versus standard care after severe traumatic brain injury. Primary feasibility outcomes are the proportion of included participants who were randomised out of all screened patients; the proportion of participants allocated to the experimental intervention who received at least 60% of the planned exercise sessions; and safety outcomes such as adverse events and reactions and serious adverse events and reactions. Exploratory clinical outcomes are suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions; and functional outcomes as assessed by Coma Recovery Scale – Revised at four weeks; Early Functional Ability Scale and Functional Independence Measure at three months. The description includes the statistical analyses including use of multiple imputation and Trial Sequential Analysis. Conclusions: The present statistical analysis plan serves to minimise potential trial reporting bias and selective P hacking and to improve transparency. This trial will inform the feasibility of a potential future multicentre randomised clinical trial. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02924649. Registered on 3 October 2016.

Section: Ethical Approvalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Main Trial Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Statistical analysis plan for early mobilisation by head-up tilt with stepping versus standard care after severe traumatic brain injury – a randomised clinical feasibility trial

Gluud

Jakobsen

et al. 2019

Preprint

Self Cite

Statistical analysis plan: Early mobilization by head-up tilt with stepping versus standard care after severe traumatic brain injury

Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications

Gluud

Jakobsen

et al. 2021

Self Cite

Background Early mobilization on a tilt table with stepping versus standard care may be beneficial for patients with severe brain injury, but data from randomized clinical trials are lacking. This detailed statistical analysis plan describes the analyses of data collected in a randomized clinical feasibility trial for early mobilization by head-up tilt with stepping versus standard care after severe traumatic brain injury. Methods Primary feasibility outcomes are the proportion of included participants who were randomized out of all screened patients; the proportion of participants allocated to the experimental intervention who received at least 60% of the planned exercise sessions; and safety outcomes such as adverse events and reactions and serious adverse events and reactions. Exploratory clinical outcomes are suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions; and functional outcomes as assessed by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised at four weeks; Early Functional Ability Scale and Functional Independence Measure at three months. The description includes the statistical analysis plan, including the use of multiple imputations and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation during early orthostatic exercise in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: Further exploratory analyses from a randomized clinical feasibility trial

Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Olsen

Berg

et al. 2021

Self Cite

In patients with severe traumatic brain injury, there is limited evidence of the clinical effect of early orthostatic exercise, although such exercise may strengthen systemic or cerebral hemodynamic responses to head-up tilt, thereby minimizing orthostatic intolerance. We measured dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) and the occurrence of orthostatic intolerance after four weeks of regular orthostatic exercise by head-up tilt using a tilt table with integrated stepping using the ERIGO Ò tilt-table and comparing it to standard care. Thirty-four patients with severe traumatic brain injury admitted to a neurocritical care unit were included in this randomized clinical trial. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv), non-invasive mean arterial pressure, heart rate and PaCO 2 were recorded; dCA was measured by the non-invasive mean flow index (nMxa). Transition from the supine position to head-up tilt triggered a 10-16% decrease in MCAv and increased nMxa in both groups at all time points (P < 0.05), with no differences between groups. There was no difference in the number of episodes with orthostatic intolerance (5 vs 3; 1 vs 2; 1 vs 0) at baseline, two weeks and four weeks, respectively, and no association between changes in PaCO 2 -adjusted nMxa and the occurrence of orthostatic reactions (P = 0.35). Early orthostatic exercise does not affect dynamic cerebral autoregulation and does not protect against orthostatic intolerance in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02924649. Registered on 3rd October 2016.