2010
DOI: 10.1353/jsr.0.0027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Modern Communism: The Diggers and Community of Goods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that trails spots begin to thicken discourses on participation in the commons, whereby the spirit of building on or reclaiming land for a 'publics' use (which in the past may have come from a politically motivated group concerned with subsistence, e.g. the Diggers [26]) is simultaneously one of appropriation and enclosure for a public concerned with play and fun. 5 In which case, these spaces represent a conceptual thorn in that they are not 'enclosed' or made private by the construction of walls or fences, but they are not quite the opposite -a commons that is open to and equally accessible to everyone.…”
Section: Part I: (Non-)participation In the (Un-)commonsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We find that trails spots begin to thicken discourses on participation in the commons, whereby the spirit of building on or reclaiming land for a 'publics' use (which in the past may have come from a politically motivated group concerned with subsistence, e.g. the Diggers [26]) is simultaneously one of appropriation and enclosure for a public concerned with play and fun. 5 In which case, these spaces represent a conceptual thorn in that they are not 'enclosed' or made private by the construction of walls or fences, but they are not quite the opposite -a commons that is open to and equally accessible to everyone.…”
Section: Part I: (Non-)participation In the (Un-)commonsmentioning
confidence: 90%