2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Neolithic chert variability in central Cyprus: Geo-chemical and spatial analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second cluster of sites reported by surveys in central Cyprus provides 12 more surface-collected lithic assemblages with analogies to the excavated Akrotiri phase sites (Given & Knapp 2003;McCartney et al 2010). Despite none of these lithic assemblages having dates, the sites demonstrate possible early exploration from the shore to the island's interior via the Tremithous and Yialias river basins (Stewart et al 2020). Hunting and foraging activities persisted during the development of the rst permanent settlements, such as Ayios Tychonas Klimonas, demonstrating mixed economies encompassing hunting, plant cultivation, and modest consumption of marine foods at the beginning of sedentary occupation of Cyprus (e.g., Vigne et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A second cluster of sites reported by surveys in central Cyprus provides 12 more surface-collected lithic assemblages with analogies to the excavated Akrotiri phase sites (Given & Knapp 2003;McCartney et al 2010). Despite none of these lithic assemblages having dates, the sites demonstrate possible early exploration from the shore to the island's interior via the Tremithous and Yialias river basins (Stewart et al 2020). Hunting and foraging activities persisted during the development of the rst permanent settlements, such as Ayios Tychonas Klimonas, demonstrating mixed economies encompassing hunting, plant cultivation, and modest consumption of marine foods at the beginning of sedentary occupation of Cyprus (e.g., Vigne et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The traditional approach, mostly focusing on macroscopic and petrographic characterizations, is limited in the case of a convergence of facies, that is, where different geological formations possess very similar features (Aubry, 1990). In contrast, geochemical analysis usually allows the identification of differences between sources and, thus, helps to pinpoint the origin of the archaeological remains (e.g., Brandl & Hauzenberger, 2018; Golovanova et al, 2021; Stewart et al, 2020). Several analytical techniques have been applied in Western Europe to characterize the lithic artefacts recovered at Palaeolithic sequences, quantification of the trace elements and rare earth being the most frequently used as the key to solve the problem at hand (e.g., Eixea et al, 2021; Muntoni et al, 2022; Pereira et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geochemical analyses of chert artifacts have been increasingly employed in determining their geological origins that provide evidence for past human behaviors related to the procurement, selection, and distribution of lithic raw materials (Agam, 2020; Beller et al, 2020; Ekshtain & Tryon, 2019; Ekshtain & Zaidner, 2021; Finkel et al, 2019; Julig et al, 2007; Malinsky‐Buller et al, 2014; Sánchez de la Torre et al, 2020; Shackley, 2008; Stewart et al, 2020). However, in contrast to obsidian, for which nondestructive chemical analyses, such as ED‐XRF, have become widely available, visual inspection still takes a great role in the characterization of chert artifacts due to the limited availability and high cost of nondestructive chemical analyses, such as LA‐ICP‐MS, as well as the great variability of chert in visual attributes, such as color, texture, and fossil contents (Luedtke, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%