2018
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Oral Switch to Linezolid for Low-risk Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study

Abstract: Background Oral switch to linezolid is a promising alternative to standard parenteral therapy (SPT) in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of all adult cases of SAB between 2013 and 2017 in a Spanish university hospital. We compared the efficacy, safety, and length of hospital stay of patients receiving SPT and those where SPT was switched to oral linezolid between days 3 and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
51
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept was recently demonstrated in the Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection (OVIVA) randomized trial where non-inferiority of PO stepdown was established for bone and joint infections [54]. Clinicians and investigators are becoming more comfortable transitioning patients with uncomplicated S. aureus bloodstream infections to PO regimens [55][56][57]. Regardless, lefamulin bone/joint concentration data and clinical evidence for patients with bloodstream infection are not available.…”
Section: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept was recently demonstrated in the Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection (OVIVA) randomized trial where non-inferiority of PO stepdown was established for bone and joint infections [54]. Clinicians and investigators are becoming more comfortable transitioning patients with uncomplicated S. aureus bloodstream infections to PO regimens [55][56][57]. Regardless, lefamulin bone/joint concentration data and clinical evidence for patients with bloodstream infection are not available.…”
Section: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequently identified organism was Streptococci. Median time to randomization was 17 days in both groups, followed by median treatment durations of 19 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 14-25) and 17 days (IQR: [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] for the intravenous and oral groups, respectively. Median length of stay (LOS) after randomization was 19 days (IQR: 14-25) and 3 days (IQR: 1-10) for the intravenous and oral groups, respectively (P < .001).…”
Section: Iversen Et Al Partial Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotic Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical and microbiological resolution by day 4 occurred in 68.4% of the piperacillintazobactam group compared with 74.6% of the meropenem group (difference, À6.2%; 95% CI, À15.5% to 3.1%; P ¼ . 19). There were no significant differences observed in other secondary outcomes, including rates of microbiological relapse, secondary infection with another MDR organism, Clostridioides difficile infection, and nonfatal serious adverse events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study of uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, a similar approach with initial IV therapy and oral linezolid follow-up treatment was noninferior to all-IV treatment. 38 Decisions about the early transition to oral antimicrobials should be made in conjunction with infectious disease specialists where available.…”
Section: What Is the Best Location For Patients To Receive Antibioticmentioning
confidence: 99%