2015
DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.peds14228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early outcome of combined endoscopic third ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization in childhood hydrocephalus

Abstract: OBJECT Although shunts have been the mainstay in treating hydrocephalus over the past 5 decades, the use of endoscopic techniques in addressing this disorder in children offers both the neurosurgeon and the patient a unique opportunity to avoid shunting and its attendant complications. The combination of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) with choroid plexus cauterization (CPC) remains uncommon in most centers despite its potential promise. The authors sought to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,10,11,13,14,17,20,34,45 However, the mortality rate of 3.5% in our series is not negligible, and, although similar to that reported by Kulkarni et al (8.3%), 29 it is higher than mortality reported in series of infants undergoing ETV/ CPC in other North American centers (0%), 44 in Uganda (1.0%), and following ETV alone worldwide, where it is closer to 0%. 1,2,10,11,13,14,20,34,45 However, comparison between cohorts of patients undergoing ETV/CPC, ETV, or CSF shunting from different studies and centers is severely lim- ited by differences in the patient populations. Differences in mortality are likely heavily influenced by this selection bias, as patients undergoing ETV/CPC suffer from more complex underlying conditions (e.g., IVH of prematurity, hydranencephaly) than those undergoing standard ETV.…”
Section: Is Etv/cpc Safe?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,10,11,13,14,17,20,34,45 However, the mortality rate of 3.5% in our series is not negligible, and, although similar to that reported by Kulkarni et al (8.3%), 29 it is higher than mortality reported in series of infants undergoing ETV/ CPC in other North American centers (0%), 44 in Uganda (1.0%), and following ETV alone worldwide, where it is closer to 0%. 1,2,10,11,13,14,20,34,45 However, comparison between cohorts of patients undergoing ETV/CPC, ETV, or CSF shunting from different studies and centers is severely lim- ited by differences in the patient populations. Differences in mortality are likely heavily influenced by this selection bias, as patients undergoing ETV/CPC suffer from more complex underlying conditions (e.g., IVH of prematurity, hydranencephaly) than those undergoing standard ETV.…”
Section: Is Etv/cpc Safe?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both types of neuroendoscopes are used across centers in North America for ETV/CPC, with reported 12-month success rates ranging from 38% for rigid neuroendoscopy 20 to 57% for flexible neuroendoscopy. 8 In Africa, Asia, and Europe, both flexible neuroendoscopy 1,5,9,10,14,15,19 and rigid neuroendoscopy 2 have been used, with no consensus on the superiority of either technique. A retrospective review of ETV/CPC treatment outcomes from multiple North American centers participating in the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network suggested that greater extent of CPC and the use of a flexible neuroendoscope were associated with improved success, although the sample size was small and the patients were not randomized to neuroendoscopy type.…”
Section: 9-11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,11] This series recorded a slight male preponderance in the incidence of hydrocephalus [ Table 1] with a male to female ratio of 1.3:1 which is similar to the reports in other parts of Nigeria and America. [10,[12][13][14] There was no obvious reason for this finding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%