2016
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early outcomes from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit

Abstract: Background: In 2011, the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) group began nationwide registration of all patients undergoing surgery with the intention of resection for oesophageal or gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to describe the initiation and implementation of this process along with an overview of the results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
122
1
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
122
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be that surgical quality increased over the years due to centralization of stomach surgery in The Netherlands (started in 2009), but no data are currently available to support this hypothesis. Another factor is the start of the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA) in 2011, which has contributed to an increase in LNY 22. In the DUCA, LNY (>15 nodes) is seen as an important quality indicator, which may have motivated centers to increase their LNY 22.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It could be that surgical quality increased over the years due to centralization of stomach surgery in The Netherlands (started in 2009), but no data are currently available to support this hypothesis. Another factor is the start of the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA) in 2011, which has contributed to an increase in LNY 22. In the DUCA, LNY (>15 nodes) is seen as an important quality indicator, which may have motivated centers to increase their LNY 22.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor is the start of the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA) in 2011, which has contributed to an increase in LNY 22. In the DUCA, LNY (>15 nodes) is seen as an important quality indicator, which may have motivated centers to increase their LNY 22. This increase may then be due to an improvement in surgical quality, but could also be attributed to a more thorough inspection of the resection specimen by pathologists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve quality of surgical cancer care in the Netherlands, nationwide outcome registries have been initiated. In 2011, the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) was initiated to register all patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancer. Quality measurement of multidimensional care pathways, however, cannot be captured in a single parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Ook in andere audits, zoals die voor maagkanker (DUCA), worden dit soort verbeteringen gezien, met een daling van de mortaliteit van 7,7 naar 4,2 % in diezelfde tijdsperiode [8,25]. Ook de gewenste uitkomsten, zoals radicaliteit van rectumcarcinoomresecties, verbeteren aanzienlijk, waarbij het gemiddelde percentage tumorpositieve circumferentiële resectiemarges daalde van 14,2 naar 5,6 % in vier jaar tijd [26].…”
Section: Uitkomstenunclassified