1987
DOI: 10.1016/0006-3223(87)90070-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of oral d-amphetamine in normal subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
85
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
12
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The behavioral effects of d-amphetamine peaked at approximately two hours following administration, in agreement with previous human laboratory research (e.g., Chait et al, 1985;Kelly et al, 1993;Rush et al, 1998) and the time course for peak plasma levels following oral administration (Angrist et al, 1987). Thus, the peak effects of the damphetamine pretreatment dose occurred during completion of the modified progressive-ratio procedure in Self-Administration Sessions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The behavioral effects of d-amphetamine peaked at approximately two hours following administration, in agreement with previous human laboratory research (e.g., Chait et al, 1985;Kelly et al, 1993;Rush et al, 1998) and the time course for peak plasma levels following oral administration (Angrist et al, 1987). Thus, the peak effects of the damphetamine pretreatment dose occurred during completion of the modified progressive-ratio procedure in Self-Administration Sessions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…rather than i.v. Oral drug administration is associated with lower and more variable bioavailability (Angrist et al, 1987;Ylitalo, 1991). Nonetheless, plasma levels of amphetamine did not differ on the two test sessions, and we have previously shown that the dose used here induces significant decreases in [ 11 C]raclopride BP in ventral striatum .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…For example, amphetamine is known to have vasoconstrictive effects, which can result in alterations of blood flow (Simpson 1976;Angrist et al 1987;Brauer et al 1996). Although it seems unlikely, amphetamine may have directly affected blood flow only in the specific brain areas where changes in the activation pattern were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%