2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69474-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Pleistocene origin and extensive intra-species diversity of the extinct cave lion

Abstract: The cave lion is an extinct felid that was widespread across the Holarctic throughout the Late pleistocene. its closest extant relative is the lion (Panthera leo), but the timing of the divergence between these two taxa, as well as their taxonomic ranking are contentious. In this study we analyse 31 mitochondrial genome sequences from cave lion individuals that, through a combination of 14 c and genetic tip dating, are estimated to be from dates extending well into the mid-Pleistocene. We identified two deeply… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples ALAS_024, VAL_033, ALAS_016, VAL_008, HMNH_007, HMNH_011, VAL_050, VAL_005, DS04, VAL_037, VAL_012, VAL_011, VAL_18A, IN18_016 and IN18_005 were processed at the Swedish Museum of Natural History in Stockholm, Sweden, following previously described methods for permafrost bone and tooth samples 51 . In brief, this involved DNA extraction using the methodology of ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples ALAS_024, VAL_033, ALAS_016, VAL_008, HMNH_007, HMNH_011, VAL_050, VAL_005, DS04, VAL_037, VAL_012, VAL_011, VAL_18A, IN18_016 and IN18_005 were processed at the Swedish Museum of Natural History in Stockholm, Sweden, following previously described methods for permafrost bone and tooth samples 51 . In brief, this involved DNA extraction using the methodology of ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phylogenetic relationships of these felids and their taxonomic ranking are, however, still controversial and not well resolved. Morphological studies supplemented by molecular data in the past decades have provided support for both the species model (Terzea, 1965;Vereshchagin, 1971;Wiszniowska, 1978;Baryshnikov and Boeskorov, 2001;Sotnikova and Nikolskiy, 2006;Ovodov and Zaika, 2008;Barnett et al, 2009Barnett et al, , 2014Barnett et al, , 2016Christiansen and Harris, 2009;Mazák, 2010;Stuart and Lister, 2011;Ersmark et al, 2015;Chernova et al, 2020;Stanton et al, 2020) and the subspecies model Kurtén, 1968Kurtén, , 1985Hemmer, 1967Hemmer, , 1974Schütt, 1969;Schütt and Hemmer, 1978;Turner, 1984;Gross, 1992;Burger et al, 2004;Bona, 2006;Diedrich, 2008Diedrich, , 2009Diedrich, , 2011aDiedrich, , 2011cSchouwenburg et al, 2009;Baryshnikov and Tsoukala, 2010;Diedrich and Rathgeber, 2012;de Manuel et al, 2020). In addition, lions with their enormous Pleistocene geographic distribution from Africa through Eurasia up to America show relatively great morphological differences between regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to molecularly determine sex, we extracted DNA, built double-stranded Illumina libraries, and shotgun-sequenced the two cave lion samples of hair and skin following the approach of Stanton et al [11]. Briefly, the tissue was digested in a buffer optimised to digest keratin-rich tissues [12], before extracting DNA using the methodology of Yang et al [13].…”
Section: Sampling and Dna Lab Workmentioning
confidence: 99%