2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early post-fire bird community in European boreal forest: Comparing salvage-logged with non-intervention areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final database included full species-by-plot abundance matrices of bats 44 , birds 12,[40][41][42][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] , ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) 52,53 , deadwood dependent (i.e., saproxylic) beetles 8,42 , non-saproxylic beetles 42 , Hymenoptera 42 , epigeic spiders 53 , epigeic and epixylic bryophytes 42,54 , epigeic and epixylic lichens 42 , hoverflies 53 , nocturnal moths 55 , scuttle flies 56 , true bugs (Heteroptera) 53 , wood-inhabiting fungi 42 , and vascular plants 13,42,55,[57][58][59][60][61][62] . We defined deadwooddependent beetles, epixylic lichens, epixylic bryophytes, and wood-inhabiting fungi as saproxylic species groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final database included full species-by-plot abundance matrices of bats 44 , birds 12,[40][41][42][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] , ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) 52,53 , deadwood dependent (i.e., saproxylic) beetles 8,42 , non-saproxylic beetles 42 , Hymenoptera 42 , epigeic spiders 53 , epigeic and epixylic bryophytes 42,54 , epigeic and epixylic lichens 42 , hoverflies 53 , nocturnal moths 55 , scuttle flies 56 , true bugs (Heteroptera) 53 , wood-inhabiting fungi 42 , and vascular plants 13,42,55,[57][58][59][60][61][62] . We defined deadwooddependent beetles, epixylic lichens, epixylic bryophytes, and wood-inhabiting fungi as saproxylic species groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With agricultural intensification, fields have become larger, semi-natural habitats have declined and the farmland landscape has become more homogenous (Ihse, 1995, Tscharntke et al, 2005. However, farmland species do not occur exclusively on farmland (Söderström, 2009, Stjernman et al, 2013, Żmihorski et al, 2016: mosaic landscapes of other open habitats and forested areas are also important for many species (Pitkänen & Tiainen, 2001, Żmihorski et al, 2019. A growing number of studies have shown that human-made habitat such as forest clear-cuts have potential as suitable habitat for farmland species (see review by Ram et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, while several studies have evaluated the effects of post-fire salvage logging on birds in western conifer forests (e.g., Haggard and Gaines 2001, Hutto and Gallo 2006, Saab et al 2007, Cahall and Hayes 2009, Rost et al 2013, most have focused on a narrow subset of the bird community. As the annual area burned and the proportion burned at high severity increase (Steel et al 2018), it is also important to evaluate more comprehensively how the bird community responds to salvage logging, in particular mature forest species (Lee et al 2013;Zmihorski et al 2019). The majority of post-fire salvage logging studies have also focused on single fires, and thus, the resulting burn patterns, fire size, landscape context, and post-fire management directives may be unique to that particular fire (Rost et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%