2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1626-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early postoperative improvements in the QuickDASH score after distal radius fracture are related to the type of surgical treatment

Abstract: The goal of this prospective study was to evaluate the real-life experience of 52 patients and their recovery kinetics in the first 6 weeks after surgical treatment of distal radius fractures. The fractures were treated with either a fourth-generation volar locking plate (34 patients, mean age 67 years, range 54-82) or by percutaneous pinning (18 patients, mean age 56 years, range 43-69). These patients were evaluated every week for 6 weeks with the QuickDASH (QD) questionnaire. A lower QD score indicated that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in patients over the age of 65 years, QuickDASH scores at 12 months have been shown to be equivalent between patients treated with cast immobilization versus volar locking plate. 17 18 19 We found that QuickDASH scores did not significantly differ between the adult groups regardless of treatment and were similar to previously reported postoperative DASH (22.3) and QuickDASH scores (20.9–21.0) in unilateral DRF. 20 21 22…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, in patients over the age of 65 years, QuickDASH scores at 12 months have been shown to be equivalent between patients treated with cast immobilization versus volar locking plate. 17 18 19 We found that QuickDASH scores did not significantly differ between the adult groups regardless of treatment and were similar to previously reported postoperative DASH (22.3) and QuickDASH scores (20.9–21.0) in unilateral DRF. 20 21 22…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The full texts of the remaining 34 articles were reviewed, and 14 were excluded, the reasons for which are shown in Figure 1. Thus, 20 articles were included in the meta-analysis (Aita et al., 2014; Bahari-Kashani et al., 2013; Costa et al., 2014; Dzaja et al., 2013; Egol et al., 2008; Goehre et al., 2014; Gradl et al., 2013; Grewal et al., 2011; Hollevoet et al., 2011; Jeudy et al., 2012; Karantana et al., 2013; Kumbaraci et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2012; Loisel et al., 2015; Maire et al., 2013; Marcheix et al., 2010; McFadyen et al., 2011; Rozental et al., 2009; Tronci et al., 2013; Williksen et al., 2013).
Figure 1.Flow diagram of study selection.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was heterogeneity with respect to the fracture types studied. Most included studies focused on patients with AO type A and C fractures, but several studies (Costa et al., 2014; Egol et al., 2008; Loisel et al., 2015; Maire et al., 2013) also included patients with type B fractures, and we did not perform a subgroup analysis based on fracture type. There was also heterogeneity in the procedures and materials used as well as the methods of external fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study characteristics. The reports included were of mixed study designs and quality; 18 were observational study designs [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and 28 were randomised controlled trials. The study characteristics are detailed in Table III.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%