1968
DOI: 10.1017/s0003581500034879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Pre-Roman Iron Age Communities in Eastern England

Abstract: The pre-Roman Iron Age communities of eastern England have not received the attention afforded to those of other parts of the British Isles. Admittedly, individual sites such as West Harling and Fengate have been published in detail, and the affinities of their materials have been discussed, but little attempt has been made to study the region as a whole. The nature of the problem, however, was vividly underlined by the admirable summary published by Clarke thirty years ago (Clarke, 1939). Although at the time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distinctive class IV bowls are closely similar to vessels from Darmsden which Cunliffe (1968) has used as part of the criteria for his Darmsden-Linton style. Jars with T-shaped or expanded rims are also common amongst Darmsden-Linton groups (Cunliffe 1968, fig.…”
Section: External Featuresmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The distinctive class IV bowls are closely similar to vessels from Darmsden which Cunliffe (1968) has used as part of the criteria for his Darmsden-Linton style. Jars with T-shaped or expanded rims are also common amongst Darmsden-Linton groups (Cunliffe 1968, fig.…”
Section: External Featuresmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Double rows of finger-tip impressions on Class I jars also occur at Heathrow on a part of the site which also produced pedestal bases and round bodied bowls (I thank Mr R. Canham for allowing me to study the pottery). The bowls are comparable to some from pit 1 at Darmsden, Suffolk, although they lack the burnished surfaces of the Darmsden bowls (Cunliffe 1968, fig. 2).…”
Section: Cf 127mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The use of conspicuous funerary vessels, though not unknown in this period, was evidently rare (Clarke, 1940). However, where huts or rubbish pits have been excavated, as at Brantham, Darmsden (Cunliffe, 1968), Fakenham, Wattisfield (Wacher, 1961) the same depressing lack of artifacts of bone or metal has prevailed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%