2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Prediction of Cognitive Deficit in Very Preterm Infants Using Brain Structural Connectome With Transfer Learning Enhanced Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

Abstract: Up to 40% of very preterm infants (≤32 weeks' gestational age) were identified with a cognitive deficit at 2 years of age. Yet, accurate clinical diagnosis of cognitive deficit cannot be made until early childhood around 3-5 years of age. Recently, brain structural connectome that was constructed by advanced diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) technique has been playing an important role in understanding human cognitive functions. However, available annotated neuroimaging datasets with clinical and outcome informat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neurodevelopmental deficits can be understood as dysconnectivity syndromes, therefore the quantifications of the abnormal structural and functional network using graph theory may enable neurodevelopmental prognosis. In VPIs, we have previously established correlations of later neurodevelopmental outcomes with at term obtained functional connectivity features derived from rs-fMRI (Gozdas et al, 2018); and structural connectivity features derived from DTI (Chen et al, 2020). In this work, our results showed both structural and functional connectivity features obtained at termequivalent age are predictive of abnormal cognitive, language, and motor outcomes at 2 years corrected age.…”
Section: Most Discriminative Feature Identificationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Neurodevelopmental deficits can be understood as dysconnectivity syndromes, therefore the quantifications of the abnormal structural and functional network using graph theory may enable neurodevelopmental prognosis. In VPIs, we have previously established correlations of later neurodevelopmental outcomes with at term obtained functional connectivity features derived from rs-fMRI (Gozdas et al, 2018); and structural connectivity features derived from DTI (Chen et al, 2020). In this work, our results showed both structural and functional connectivity features obtained at termequivalent age are predictive of abnormal cognitive, language, and motor outcomes at 2 years corrected age.…”
Section: Most Discriminative Feature Identificationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Brain connectome has demonstrated promising predictive power in many brain disorder studies. 3,4,42 The spatial and topological information is discriminative for prediction. In this study, the structural brain connectome was constructed using an infant brain atlas,and the atlas is developed based on an anatomical parcellation of brain regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques has facilitated quantitative mapping of the connections within and between brain regions, that is, brain connectome 1,2 . The brain connectome has been considered as a key to understanding the exact etiologies behind many neurological disorders, ranging from cognitive deficits in preterm infants to Alzheimer's disease in the elderly 3–8 . Mathematically, a connectome is a graph, representing the brain connectivity (described as a set of edges) between pairs of brain regions of interest (ROI) (described as a set of nodes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, being agnostic to cumulative errors is undeniably substantial for making predictions that are interpretable in the clinical world. Recent studies aimed to solve this issue by leveraging deep learning (DL) models such as convolutional neural network (CNN) which is inherently trained in an end-to-end fashion (36). While effective when compared to traditional machine learning methods, still DL methods do not generalize well to non-Euclidean data types (e.g., graphs).…”
Section: Functional Brain Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%