2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early pulmonary toxicity following lung stereotactic body radiation therapy delivered in consecutive daily fractions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple clinical factors, including tumor volume, dose, and smoking history, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of radiation pneumonitis, but immune parameters have not been fully evaluated. 29,30 The assumption has been that radiation pneumonitis is driven through the engagement of inflammatory pathways with a predominantly Th2 composition that ultimately leads to lung inflammation and the clinical manifestation of pneumonitis. 31,32 A potential explanation for why a higher NLR might protect against radiation pneumonitis is that high NLRs suggest that the inflammatory responses are already active and that this baseline inflammation, in turn, might suppress the activity of other, competing immune cells, including lymphocytes, activated T cells, and natural killer cells that would have otherwise become mobilized by the radiation treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple clinical factors, including tumor volume, dose, and smoking history, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of radiation pneumonitis, but immune parameters have not been fully evaluated. 29,30 The assumption has been that radiation pneumonitis is driven through the engagement of inflammatory pathways with a predominantly Th2 composition that ultimately leads to lung inflammation and the clinical manifestation of pneumonitis. 31,32 A potential explanation for why a higher NLR might protect against radiation pneumonitis is that high NLRs suggest that the inflammatory responses are already active and that this baseline inflammation, in turn, might suppress the activity of other, competing immune cells, including lymphocytes, activated T cells, and natural killer cells that would have otherwise become mobilized by the radiation treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scoring systems should be considered when interpreting RP results. The reported rates of symptomatic RP after SBRT range from 9% to 28% [8,10,11,[28][29][30][31] . Although most of the RP was Grade 1 or 2 and either asymptomatic or Yamashita H et al .…”
Section: Rp After Sbrtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 RP in the whole series was in accordance with the reported incidence for patients undergoing SBRT for lung lesions. 3,[10][11][12][13] Thus, in the RAS inhibitor group, only 3 patients developed symptomatic RP compared with 19 patients in the non-RAS inhibitor group. The retrospective nature and relatively low number of patients analyzed were the main limitations of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…8,9 The incidence of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) after SBRT is usually low, ranging from 9% to 28%. 3,[10][11][12][13] The volumes treated are typically small, allowing the delivery of high radiation doses to the target volume, sparing the surrounding healthy tissue, reflected in the low rate of RP observed. However, SBRT might not be tolerated because most patients will have advanced age and/or comorbidities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%